Foreign Assistance

How the Funds Are Spent Gao ID: NSIAD-86-73 March 7, 1986

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed fiscal year 1984 foreign assistance program outlays to determine how funds were actually spent and who benefited from the program.

GAO found that: (1) the Agency for International Development (AID) disbursed significant portions of its assistance funds in the United States to a variety of entities, which directly benefited the U.S. economy, the recipient organizations, and the recipient countries involved; (2) AID paid over 75 percent of its disbursements in 9 states and the District of Columbia; (3) the Export-Import Bank paid almost all of its disbursements to U.S. suppliers of materials and services; (4) the World Bank and other multilateral development banks procured less than 10 percent of their goods and services from U.S. sources; (5) the United Nations (UN) Development Program paid about 23 percent of its disbursements to U.S. suppliers; and (6) the UN Children's Fund expended about $47.9 million in the United States, compared to the $53 million in voluntary contributions it collected in the United States. GAO also found that: (1) it could not identify funding sources for foreign military sales (FMS) contractor payments because FMS loan and Military Assistance Program funds are commingled in individual trust funds for each recipient nation; (2) companies in 10 states received about 84.1 percent of FMS contract awards; and (3) the top 10 FMS contractors received about 59 percent of FMS contract awards.

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.