Foreign Assistance

Resettlement of Panama's Displaced El Chorrillo Residents Gao ID: NSIAD-91-63BR December 20, 1990

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated the Agency for International Development's (AID) progress in resettling Panama City residents who were displaced as a result of U.S. military action in December 1989, focusing on: (1) the living conditions at a temporary housing facility; (2) the status of the program to find permanent replacement housing for the displaced residents; and (3) factors that could impede further progress in providing permanent homes.

GAO found that: (1) the living conditions at the temporary housing facility generally met acceptable standards defined by international refugee organizations; (2) food services appeared adequate, living space, toilet, and bath areas were clean and sanitary, and medical care was available; (3) the two international organizations that inspected the quarters prior to occupancy concluded that the size of the living quarters was adequate for a temporary facility; (4) AID reported that, 6 months after its permanent housing program began, it completed delivery of 142 of the estimated 2,200 replacement homes needed for displaced residents; (5) AID reported that it corrected problems that initially slowed the program, housing units would soon become more rapidly available, and the temporary camps could close by March 1991; (6) AID addressed factors that impeded progress and assigned an AID engineer to work with housing contractors and the Panamanian utility company to correct development problems; (7) AID and the Panamanian government were still working to determine the number of eligible persons and households that would need housing; and (8) AID resolved a problem involving the funding difference between the estimated 2,200 homes that are needed and the 2,000 homes that AID originally funded.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.