Forest Service's Region 5 Should Consider Less Costly Ways To Meet Word and Data Processing Needs

Gao ID: CED-81-15 October 23, 1980

GAO reviewed the procurement of word processing equipment carried out during 1979 by the Forest Service's Pacific Southwest Region. At the time, the regional office and 10 of the region's national forest offices leased advanced word processing capability for 2 years. Another four national forest offices leased equipment with only word processing capability. The advanced equipment was acquired to develop a regional network integrating communications with the equipment's word and data processing capabilities to support mission requirements. The annual rental and maintenance costs for the leased equipment are about $1.4 million.

Although the equipment is providing benefits, GAO found the procurement to be unnecessarily costly. The review disclosed that the region in question: (1) prepared a feasibility study of equipment alternatives that did not adequately support the data processing requirements or the procurement alternative selected; (2) leased the equipment even though its lease-versus-purchase analysis showed that purchasing the equipment was more economical because it did not want to request a waiver from a Washington office directive freezing purchases; and (3) did not comply with federal procurement policy, which requires that full consideration be given to consolidating individual small-volume orders and that competitive procurement procedures be used whenever feasible to obtain the lowest possible price.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.