Special Report on Investigation of NFCS Contract

Gao ID: OSI-91-12 September 6, 1991

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO investigated potential wrongdoing revealed during its audit of the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) 1987-88 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (NFCS), focusing on whether: (1) any conflicts of interest existed between USDA and the survey contractor; and (2) the contractor submitted proper contract charges to USDA for payment under the NFCS contract.

GAO found that: (1) although no evidence existed to suggest that any conflicts of interest occurred between USDA personnel and the contractor, the contractor's headquarters concluded that it had never conducted the nonresponsive follow-up survey and that its personnel misapplied charges for NFCS work to the billings for another USDA contract; (2) the contractor informed USDA and GAO that the nonresponse follow-up survey had been completed, but that it lost the documentation to support the survey during a relocation; (3) the contractor's project director said that although she was responsible for NFCS data, she had not been involved in a nonresponse followup, was unaware the contract called for a followup, and did not know if a followup had been done; (4) the officer in charge of NFCS did not provide any information regarding the conflicting information; (5) the contractor's attorneys concluded that the contractor had not conducted the follow-up survey and lied about the lost documentation to avoid embarrassment regarding its failure to perform the contractually required task; (6) the contractor's attorneys acknowledged that the officer in charge of NFCS told contract management, USDA, and GAO that the data had been lost; (7) the contractor's attorneys stated that, during May and June 1990, the contractor ordered several of its employees to charge NFCS work to another USDA contract; (8) the contractor's attorneys said that the contractor also provided misinformation regarding the NFCS nonresponse follow-up survey and mischarged time; and (9) the attorneys indicated that the contractor was willfully cooperating with ongoing investigations.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.