Forest Service Priorities

Evolving Mission Favors Resource Protection Over Production Gao ID: RCED-99-166 June 17, 1999

The Forest Service's mission and funding priorities have evolved over many years in response to laws, and Congress has never explicitly accepted them or acknowledged their effects on the availability of timber or other uses on the national forests. This report describes (1) the priorities that the Congress set in enacting the National Forest Management Act of 1976, which guides the development of plans for managing national forests; (2) the Forest Service's current mission and funding priorities and how they have evolved during the last two decades; and (3) the effect of these priorities on the availability of timber and on the costs of and receipts from timber sales. GAO found that the act and other multiple-use laws intended to guide the management of the national forests provide little guidance on how the agency is to resolve conflicts or make choices among competing uses on its lands.

GAO noted that: (1) the National Forest Management Act attempts to facilitate continuous levels of timber production on Forest Service lands while, at the same time, protecting and improving other forest resources, such as air, water, and wildlife and fish habitat; (2) however, the act and other multiple-use laws intended to guide the management of the national forests provide little guidance on how the agency is to resolve conflicts or make choices among competing uses on its lands; (3) the National Forest Management Act and other multiple-use laws guiding the management of the national forests provide little guidance on how the agency is to resolve conflicts or make choices among competing uses on is lands; (4) however, the requirements in environmental laws and their implementing regulations and judicial interpretations do; (5) the Forest Service has responded to these environmental requirements and judicial interpretations over time; (6) it has also responded to changing public values and concerns about the management of the national forests and to increased scientific understanding of the functioning of natural systems and their components; (7) over the past 2 decades, the Forest Service has refocused its activities away from producing goods and services (such as timber) and toward protecting land health and forest resources; (8) during the past year, the Forest Service clearly stated that its overriding mission and funding priority is to maintain or restore the health of the lands entrusted to its care; (9) furthermore, according to the Forest Service, it intends to limit goods and services in the national forests to the types, levels, and mixes imposed by considerations of land health and ecological sustainability; (10) as the Forest Service has increased its emphasis on resource protection and ecological sustainability, the timber harvested in national forests has decreased substantially, in both quantity and quality; and (11) at the same time, the per-unit costs to prepare, sell, and harvest timber have increased dramatically while the receipts have declined sharply.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.