Food Stamp Program

The U.S. Department of Agriculture provided about $16 billion in food stamp benefits to about 18 million recipients in 1999. Until the mid-1990s, most recipients bought food using coupons. Today, however, about 70 percent of all benefits are provided electronically. The government saves time and money by providing benefits electronically because there is no need to print, safeguard, distribute, account for, or destroy the coupons. This report determines the (1) extent to which the states with electronic transfer systems are identifying and disqualifying recipients who engage in trafficking and (2) steps the Food and Nutrition Service has taken to encourage states to take these actions. Of the 29 states with statewide electronic benefit systems, only four--Florida, Missouri, South Carolina, and Texas--independently and actively analyze their electronic databases to identify suspect recipients.

GAO noted that: (1) of the 29 states with statewide EBT systems, only 4--Florida, Missouri, South Carolina, and Texas--independently and proactively analyzed their electronic databases to identify suspect recipients; (2) a fifth state--Maryland--has used a list of suspected traffickers provided by the Department of Agriculture's Office of Inspector General since 1994 to provide a basis for follow-up investigations; (3) all five of these states invested the resources necessary to investigate suspect recipients, but, for fiscal years 1998 and 1999, only two states--Maryland and Texas--were responsible for about 87 percent of the 6,873 individuals disqualified nationwide from the Food Stamp Program for trafficking benefits; (4) in addition to these five states, nine others investigated suspect recipients--identified primarily by FNS--and disqualified those who engaged in trafficking, albeit to a lesser extent; (5) the remaining 15 of the 29 states did not disqualify any recipient for trafficking during the 2-year period; (6) EBT data have been available since 1993 to analyze and identify trafficking patterns; (7) however, since only five states had statewide EBT systems before 1997, FNS has only recently initiated action to work with the states to ensure that they target recipients likely to be engaged in trafficking--those identified by FNS in its successful cases against storeowners found to have engaged in trafficking; (8) in July 1999, FNS directed its seven regional offices to develop plans to work with the states to identify suspect recipients, investigate the suspects, and to disqualify those engaged in trafficking; (9) as of December 1999, these plans were still in the preliminary stages; (10) FNS will not be able to determine the effectiveness of its recent efforts in reducing the overall level of trafficking because it lacks a current, reliable estimate of the extent of trafficking; (11) such an estimate would also better permit FNS to adhere to the principles of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, which state that goals and strategies should be quantifiable and measurable; and (12) FNS could use EBT data to develop such estimates and to target its available resources.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone: