Progress and Problems of Fisheries Management Under the Fishery Conservation and Management Act

Gao ID: CED-79-23 January 9, 1979

Depletion and overfishing of domestic fishery resources prompted the passage of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1976. U.S. jurisdiction was thus extended to 200 miles from the U.S. shoreline, and a new fisheries management organization was established. Eight regional fishery management councils were set up to manage fisheries in conjunction with the States and the Department of Commerce's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). GAO examined the implementation of the Act, with emphasis on the activities of the regional councils and their interactions with NMFS.

NMFS and the eight regional councils have done much to achieve successful domestic fisheries management. They are working together toward insuring conservation and realizing the full potential of the Nation's fishery resources. Foreign fishing in the Fishery Conservation Zone, the area extending 200 miles from the U.S. coastline, has been managed through preliminary fishery management plans (FMP). FMP's have been developed to provide fisheries management for domestic and foreign fishermen, and demand has been decreased on domestic fish stocks. While the Act and the accomplishments cited have established the U.S. as a leader in fisheries management, improvements are still needed. Limited biological and socioeconomic data on which to base FMP's hinder the Act's effectiveness. Other hindrances are limited public involvement, understanding and acceptance of the FMP's, and limited long-range planning. The process of developing and approving FMP's is time-consuming and the multiplicity of jurisdictions involved are also continuing problems. The councils and NMFS are working toward solving some of these problems. Plans to provide necessary data have been approved, suggestions are being developed to streamline the approval process, and the improvement of public participation is being considered.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.