Minority Business

Awarding of Cooperative Agreement To Operate Development Centers Gao ID: RCED-87-46BR November 19, 1986

In response to a congressional request, GAO: (1) reviewed the Department of Commerce's Minority Business Development Agency's (MBDA) procedures in awarding cooperative agreements to operate Minority Business Development Centers; (2) reviewed the Southeastern Michigan Business Development Center's (SMBDC) allegations concerning the MBDA award of the 1986 cooperative agreement to operate the Detroit Center; and (3) determined whether there is a nationwide trend in which MBDA takes these agreements away from minority and community-based organizations and awards them to national accounting firms and other non-community-based organizations.

GAO found that: (1) a nationwide trend has not developed whereby national accounting firms and other non-community-based organizations replace minority and community-based firms as awardees of cooperative agreements; (2) its analysis of MBDA data showed a slight increase nationally in minority organizations' participation in the Minority Business Development Center Program; (3) in 1983, 74 percent of awardees were minority-owned organizations; (4) in fiscal year (FY) 1986, such organizations operated 78 percent of the centers; (5) in the MBDA Chicago Region, including the Detroit Center, minority-organization awardees went from 40 percent in FY 1983 to 46 percent in FY 1986; and (6) nationwide, there were only seven changes in operators to or from minority ownerships, with national accounting firms replacing minority and community-based organizations in three cases and minority and community-based organizations replacing national accounting firms in the remaining four. GAO also found that: (1) the MBDA Chicago Region followed MBDA procedures in selecting the 1986 Detroit Center awardee; and (2) the SMBDC allegations concerning the MBDA award of the 1986 agreement were without merit.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.