Sugar Program

Issues Related to Imports of Sugar-Containing Products Gao ID: RCED-88-146 June 22, 1988

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed certain aspects of the U.S. sugar program to determine: (1) the amount of sugar in imports that displaces domestic sugar; (2) the increase in such sugar imports since implementation of the sugar import quota system; (3) the amount of sugar in sugar-containing product imports that enters U.S. commerce from foreign trade zones (FTZ) and through ports of entry; (4) whether Customs Service controls over such imports were adequate to ensure compliance with regulations; and (5) administrative options available to the President to limit the importation of sugar-containing products.

GAO found that: (1) between 265,000 tons to 307,000 tons of sugar may have displaced domestic sugar in 1986; (2) the sugar entered the United States in sugar-containing products under 46 tariff categories; (3) in addition, over 1.7 million tons of raw and refined sugar entered the United States under the 1986 commodity sugar program quota; (4) the United States consumed slightly less than 8 million tons of domestic sugar in 1986; (5) the amount of sugar-containing imports in 1986 more than doubled that in 1982; (6) increases in some products were greater due to tariff classifications; (7) blended products produced in FTZ and imported through various ports of entry contained about 40,000 tons of sugar; and (8) Customs did not always enforce its laws and regulations or paperwork controls at some FTZ. GAO believes that: (1) although Customs took some actions to improve its administration of sugar allocations and other enforcement mandates, monitoring the implementation of improvement actions could help ensure proper entry of sugar imports; and (2) the President could limit sugar-containing product imports by extending import restrictions and submitting a legislative proposal to rewrite tariff schedule descriptions.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.