Export Controls

U.S. Policies and Procedures Regarding the Soviet Union Gao ID: NSIAD-90-185FS May 24, 1990

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on U.S. export controls regarding the Soviet Union, focusing on: (1) export control policies and procedures; (2) the current U.S. level of control over exports to the Soviet Union; (3) U.S. plans to liberalize such controls; and (4) U.S. businesses' views on the impact of export controls on U.S.-Soviet trade.

GAO found that: (1) the United States controlled its militarily significant exports to the Soviet Union and other selected countries by licensing exports to every country except Canada; (2) the Department of Commerce administered the control system and reviewed all proposed exports, and the Department of Defense reviewed technically sophisticated proposed exports; (3) about 85 percent of U.S. exports to the Soviet Union were agricultural goods and did not require a license, but most technical goods did require a license; (4) from 1987 to 1989, U.S. export applications that required a license increased from 1,110 to 1,813, or 63 percent; (5) from 1987 to 1989, the U.S. approved $2.6 billion in export licenses and disapproved about $1 billion; (6) domestic changes in the Soviet Union prompted negotiations for a significant U.S. reduction in export controls; (7) U.S. allies were likely to support U.S.proposals regarding liberalized export control policies; (8) U.S. businesses believed that U.S. export controls imposed for national security and foreign policy reasons hindered their marketing efforts in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union; (9) U.S. businesses believed that U.S. controls were more strict and time-consuming than those of other countries; and (10) the United States had about 100 joint ventures in the Soviet Union, but most were in low-technology or service industries, and only a few had been successful.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.