Federal Research

Information on the Advanced Technology Program's Award Selection Gao ID: RCED-99-258R August 3, 1999

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Advanced Technology Program (ATP), focusing on: (1) how ATP determines that a delay in a project's progress would be a serious national economic concern; and (2) the number of ATP applications that have been rejected since July 1997 because a delay in progress would not be a serious national economic concern or because the applicants could probably find funding elsewhere.

GAO noted that: (1) while ATP collects a great deal of economic information from applicants during the proposal process, it does not specifically assess whether the nonselection of projects would pose a serious national economic concern; (2) agency officials said that the issue of a serious national economic concern influenced the development of the program and remains a basis for the program; (3) the selection process itself focuses on evaluating the potential broad-based economic benefits of proposed projects, including an assessment of the timeliness of introducing the technology to the market; (4) since ATP does not assess whether the nonselection of projects would pose a serious national economic concern, no proposals were rejected specifically because a delay in progress would not be a serious national economic concern; (5) ATP officials said that at various stages of the review process, proposals are often rejected for a combination of factors, including a determination that applicants could probably find funding elsewhere; (6) while the proposal reviewers' comments are documented, ATP does not have a database that identifies the reasons that proposals have not been selected for funding; and (7) as a result, GAO could not readily determine how many proposals have been rejected because the applicants could probably find funding elsewhere.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.