Improving Productivity Through Better Management Of Maintenance Operations In Europe

Gao ID: LCD-75-401 March 7, 1975

GAO reviewed the Army's management of direct- and general-support activities of the V and VII Corps and the 1st Support Brigade in Germany.

GAO noted that: (1) the Army needs to better coordinate its maintenance activities in Europe; (2) as of January 1974, the Army had estimated it would cost $34 million to repair vehicle components scheduled for contractor-operated depot maintenance plants in Europe during fiscal years 1974-1975; (3) most of these components could be repaired at a lower cost by general-support maintenance activities staffed by military personnel; (4) during 1973 general-support activities in Europe had 1.2 million unused staff-hours available, estimated to cost over $3.5 million; (5) during fiscal year 1975 the Army in Europe had an estimated $6.8 million backlog of depot overhaul programs for which funds were not available; (6) shifting some programs done at depots to general-support activities would make better use of military mechanics and would free funds and depot skills for unfunded programs; (7) after GAO advised Army officials of this situation, they transferred several programs to general-support activities, effective July 1, 1974; (8) also, repairs which should have been done at the direct-support level were done at the general-support level; (9) both direct- and general-support activities took too long to repair and return urgently needed equipment to combat forces in Europe; (10) some reasons for these delays were: (a) maintenance managers did not effectively control their shops; (b) repair parts were not available because of inadequate stock management; (c) mechanics did not use even half of their available time to repair equipment; and (d) mechanics were not assigned to work they were trained to do; and (11) managers had no system for evaluating performance, so they could not identify and correct problems or plan workloads.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.