Savings Possible Through Better Management Of Quarters For Enlisted Personnel

Gao ID: LCD-76-327 June 28, 1976

GAO reviewed how the military services can greatly reduce payments for enlisted bachelors to live in the civilian community through better management of existing on-base quarters.

GAO noted that: (1) the military services either provide housing for enlisted bachelors or pay them allowances to live in the civilian community; (2) during 1975 such payments totalled about $91.3 million; (3) this cost could be greatly reduced through better management of bachelor enlisted quarters; (4) military installations manage bachelor enlisted quarters by the "unit integrity concept," in which blocks of space, such as a wing or floor, are assigned to organizational units and later to personnel; (5) people from one unit cannot be assigned to the space of another unit; (6) many people from units whose space is filled are paid to live in the civilian community although space is available in quarters assigned to other units; (7) bachelor enlisted quarters can be used to house either permanent or transient personnel, but it costs more to house transients in the civilian community; (8) appropriated funds can be conserved by skillful allocation of quarters between permanent and transient personnel; (9) military installations do not always do this; (10) the data needed to accurately determine the unnecessary costs was not contained in housing records; (11) by using the best data available at each installation, GAO estimated such costs to be $3.4 million annually at the 11 installations visited; (12) the Army and the Navy do not provide routine information which management can use to compare vacancies in quarters with the number of people paid to live off base; and (13) such information is necessary so the Department of Defense can make the best use of existing housing facilities and, at the same time, reduce its housing costs.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.