The Department of the Army's Food Irradiation Program

Is It Worth Continuing? Gao ID: PSAD-78-146 September 29, 1978

Food irradiation technology, being developed by the Department of the Army, uses high doses of radiation to sterilize meat and poultry products. In the last 25 years, the Department of Defense has spent about $51 million on research on this technology. Food irradiation is classified with food additives and requires Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval before its public use.

The Army's food irradiation program, while not yet succeeding in obtaining FDA approval of irradiated meats, has made progress in advancing the state of the art. A large portion of work performed in a renewed effort to obtain data to meet FDA requirements was wasted because the Army did not adequately review the contractor's work which was later found to be unacceptable. Although default by the contractor hampered progress toward obtaining FDA approval, the Army believes that, with continued satisfactory studies, it could obtain approval of irradiated chicken by September 1983 at an additional cost of about $10 million. Cost estimates for restarting other animal feeding studies to obtain FDA approval and for completing the study on irradiated chicken range from $28 million to $47 million. Some food irradiation proponents believe that classifying food irradiation as a process rather than as an additive would facilitate its commercial adoption, but GAO found no basis for this belief. A potential benefit of irradiated meats for use in military rations is that no refrigeration would be required during storage. However, irradiation of foods may be economically unfeasible because of its lack of acceptance in the commercial market.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.