Energy-Efficient and Cost-Effective Equipment Should Be Installed in New Government Housing

Gao ID: EMD-81-93 September 16, 1981

GAO evaluated the efforts being made and the actions that could be taken to make Government housing more energy efficient.

GAO believes that energy consumption could be substantially reduced in new housing if energy-efficient equipment were installed in Government owned, subsidized, and insured housing. Although Federal agencies have taken actions to conserve energy by reducing the heating and cooling loss through housing programs, most of the actions do not deal with the efficiency of furnaces, air conditioners, and water heaters. Normal market forces, in themselves, do not encourage the installation of the most energy-efficient and cost-effective equipment. The developer of such housing, rather than the ultimate homeowner, normally selects the heating and cooling equipment to be installed. Developers are primarily concerned with installing equipment that adequately performs the required functions at the least cost. The initial higher price of energy-efficient equipment generally results in selecting the cheaper, less efficient equipment. However, in many cases, installation of relatively inefficient equipment results in higher costs for the home buyer. Where use is sufficient, the higher costs of owning and operating readily available energy-efficient equipment is less. The installation of such equipment frequently reduces the homeowner's monthly combined outlays for house payments and utility bills.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: James Duffus Iii Team: General Accounting Office: Energy and Minerals Division Phone: (202) 512-7756


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.