Joint Major System Acquisition by the Military Services

An Elusive Strategy Gao ID: NSIAD-84-22 December 23, 1983

GAO undertook a review to determine how the merger strategy has been working in the military services' joint major system acquisitions and to offer some guidelines for criteria in joint programs.

The first joint major system acquisition program was initiated in the 1960's, and a number of other joint programs have been formed or are still in development. However, specific criteria for choosing a joint program have yet to be established. GAO has found little communality in the joint program systems deployed and few satisfied services or documented savings. The major problem in establishing joint programs is getting the services to agree on joint requirements. The Department of Defense (DOD) has few formal processes to harmonize the mission needs of services, and GAO stated that system acquisition experts were pessimistic about joint acquisitions under present arrangements. Joint programs are intended to lessen budget problems and satisfy the needs of more than one user. Therefore, GAO offered the following guidelines which might help in selecting promising joint program candidates: (1) essential service doctrines should not be unduly compromised; (2) program development should not be so advanced that the programs are not malleable; (3) military effectiveness should not be unduly lessened; (4) the programs' potential for economy should be persuasive; and (5) there should be program support by Congress, the Secretary of Defense, top military officers, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.


Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.