Department of Defense

DOD's Training Program for Polygraph Examiners Gao ID: NSIAD-86-33BR December 31, 1985

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effectiveness of the Department of Defense's (DOD) training program for polygraph examiners, focusing on: (1) whether the DOD polygraph school is authorized to conduct polygraph examinations for the purpose of training examiners; (2) the impact of any potential expansion of the school; (3) whether DOD and other federal agency examiner training needs warrant the construction of a new school building; and (4) Project Seven Screens and its relation to the congressionally authorized polygraph test program.

GAO found that: (1) a DOD directive on polygraph examinations does not authorize their use for training purposes; (2) DOD did not inform recruits who were given polygraph examinations that they were participating in a training exercise; (3) the school was instructing examiner trainees in specific techniques that could violate DOD policies designed to protect individual rights and privacy; and (4) a rapid expansion of the school would require additional instructors and could reduce the number of examinations that DOD could conduct in the near term. GAO also found that: (1) it is unclear how many examiners DOD will need to conduct its authorized number of screening examinations in 1986 and 1987; (2) DOD has generally been unable to utilize the school to its full capacity; and (3) it is uncertain whether DOD and other federal agency needs warrant the construction of a new school building for examiner training. In addition, GAO found that: (1) Project Seven Screens is an Air Force project for personnel screening examinations for special access programs; (2) the quality assurance for the Project is more extensive than in other polygraph programs; and (3) the Air Force has been conducting about 2,500 examinations each year since 1982 under the Project.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.