Air Defense Training

T-33 Aircraft Replacement Options Gao ID: NSIAD-87-10 October 1, 1986

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Air Force's plan to retire obsolete Air National Guard T-33 aircraft to determine whether replacing T-33 aircraft with T-39 aircraft and using the contractor training alternative were cost effective.

The Air Force: (1) found that the flying-hour costs to restore, operate, and maintain the T-39 aircraft would be higher than for the T-33 aircraft; and (2) estimated that the costs to operate 60 T-39 or T-33 aircraft for the first 5 years, in inflated dollars, would be $401.3 million and $344.3 million, respectively. GAO found that the estimated costs for upgraded airborne electronic countermeasure (EMC) equipment for both aircraft and the cost to retrieve and restore the T-39 aircraft were understated because, after adjusting for these understatements, the estimated costs to operate 60 T-39 or T-33 aircraft for the first 5 years, in inflated dollars, would be $409.5 million and $351.3 million, respectively. GAO was unable to determine whether contracting out the EMC mission would be more cost-effective than using the T-39 aircraft the Air Force and Air National Guard operated.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.