Bradley Vehicle

Army's Efforts To Make It More Survivable Gao ID: NSIAD-87-40 November 4, 1986

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Army's Bradley Fighting Vehicle Program, specifically: (1) live-fire testing of the Bradley's vulnerability; (2) proposed operational tests; (3) the program's original mission requirements, and subsequent changes to those requirements; and (4) the Bradley's ability to perform its role as a carrier of infantry squads and supporter of troops and tank forces during combat.

GAO found that: (1) the Army suspended the second phase of live-fire tests, begun in March 1986, pending resolution of a disagreement between it and the Department of Defense (DOD); (2) the Army expects the live-fire tests to protect the Bradley and its troops against the lower end of the scale of enemy antiarmor weapons, and is relying on the Bradley's mobility, firepower, and tactics to allow it to avoid being overmatched by enemy weapon systems most of the time; (3) the Army is requiring that new operational tests emphasize how well the tactics devised for the vehicle will offset its vulnerability while permitting it to retain its combat effectiveness; (4) the Army's original mission requirements for the vehicle to transport infantry squads into battle and support troops and tank forces during combat engagements have remained unchanged; (5) the Army has changed its tactical requirements to place more emphasis on tactics that might increase survivability; and (6) the vehicle's ability to safely transport infantry squads and support combat troops is questionable, since the Army has not demonstrated the vehicle's effectiveness in covering and concealing itself to enhance its survivability.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.