Support Aircraft

Analysis of Air Force Decision To Replace CT-39 Aircraft Gao ID: NSIAD-86-92BR April 1, 1986

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Air Force's decision to retire the CT-30 aircraft fleet and replace it with a mix of C-12F and C-21A leased aircraft.

GAO found that: (1) the Air Force used lease-versus-buy comparisons in its economic analysis of the options to replace the CT-39 aircraft and found that it was more economical to lease new aircraft than to continue operations of the existing CT-39 fleet or purchase replacement aircraft; (2) the Air Force's economic analysis was generally accurate, complete, and realistic; (3) although the full cost to extend the service life of the CT-39 fleet was not determined, the cost would have provided an additional economic justification for retirement of the CT-39; (4) although the Air Force's method of calculating leasing option costs reduced the estimated cost of leasing new aircraft over a 22-year period, the reduction did not affect the results which supported the decision to replace the CT-39; (5) there were significant differences in the operational capabilities of the CT-39 aircraft and the C-21F and C-21A aircraft; and (6) the Air Force would have to implement an extensive inspection and repair program and a series of safety and structural modifications to extend the service life of most of the CT-39 air fleet.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.