Navy Acquisition

Cost and Performance of Various Antisubmarine Warfare Systems Gao ID: NSIAD-87-119 May 8, 1987

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the cost and performance of the SQR-17A acoustic processor. The SQR-17A processes and displays acoustic information it receives from sonobuoys placed in the ocean to listen for signals that enable a ship's antisubmarine warfare (ASW) personnel to detect enemy submarines.

GAO found that: (1) the secondary function of the SQR-17A is to act as a backup processor for the sonar mounted on the ship's hull; (2) as of February 24, 1987, the Navy's stated requirement was for 85 SQR-17A and, as of March 1986, it had signed contracts for 77; (3) the Navy may procure 12 excess units in fiscal year 1987 for ships with sonar with less processing capability; (4) the Navy expects to sign a sole-source contract for its final purchase of SQR-17A by August 1987; and (5) Navy officials held varying opinions as to the usefulness of putting SQR-17A on ships without towed array sonar. GAO also found that: (1) the Navy believes that the SQQ-28 signal processor is the only alternative to the SQR-17A, since no other shipboard acoustic processor capable of processing data from modern sonobuoys is available or planned; (2) comparing the SQQ-28 and the SQR-17A is difficult because they are not interchangeable and have different capabilities and characteristics; (3) the purchase and installation cost of the SQR-17A is about $750,000, as compared to about $2.8 million for the SQQ-28; (4) the SQQ-28 is superior in processing, integration, target motion analysis, system upgrade, logistic support, resolution, and interoperability capabilities; and (5) the SQR-17A produces a paper printout, which the SQQ-28 lacks and which the Navy believes is a good feature.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.