Defense Logistics Agency Implementation of the Spare Parts Initiatives Gao ID: NSIAD-87-143 June 1, 1987

In response to a congressional request, GAO assessed the Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) progress in implementing the spare parts initiatives at the Defense Electronics Supply Center (DESC), specifically: (1) price increases; (2) the adequacy of the price analysis procurement officials performed; (3) personnel changes resulting from the initiatives; and (4) DESC difficulties in maintaining a trained and experienced contracting work force.

GAO compared the prices on 107,333 procurements totalling $507.9 million during the year ended March 1, 1985, and found that: (1) 8 percent of the procurements experienced price increases of 25 percent or more; and (2) 65 percent had either no price change or a price decrease. GAO also found that DESC: (1) bought in larger quantities, increased the use of competition, changed its employee performance evaluation factors, and provided internal government price estimates; (2) performed inadequate price analyses in 46.7 of the procurements it sampled with 25-percent price increases and in 28 percent of the procurements with no price change; and (3) did not consolidate purchase requests, resulting in unnecessary duplication of contract awards, increased administrative costs, and uneconomical purchase quantities. DESC indicated that the major obstacle to continued improvement in price analysis under the initiatives was its inability to retain experienced, well-trained buyers. GAO believes that this could slow or reduce the improvements necessary to the success of the initiatives.


Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.