Department of Defense Inventory Growth and Management Problems Continue

Gao ID: T-NSIAD-88-14 March 15, 1988

GAO discussed inventory growth and management problems in the Department of Defense (DOD), specifically the: (1) accuracy of inventory records; (2) effectiveness of research to identify the causes of inventory discrepancies; and (3) physical security of DOD inventories. GAO found that: (1) the DOD inventory of secondary items, such as spare parts and supplies, grew almost 200 percent, from $48 billion in 1981 to over $95 billion in 1987, with excesses totalling $29.5 billion; (2) many of the excesses resulted from the early purchase of spare and repair parts for weapon systems; (3) although DOD indicated that depot efficiency and productivity suffer if its warehouses are filled above 85 percent, as of June 1987, the fill level was 92 percent; (4) DOD established a program to allow its customers to return items they did not need, at a cost of $3.35 billion over the past 11 years; (5) the services tended to reorder 19 percent of items they returned within 1 year; and (6) inventory increases resulted from over-procurement of items from sole-source manufacturers, on-order excesses, increased procurement lead time, and safety-level requirements. GAO also found that DOD inventory data were inaccurate, since: (1) DOD policies allowed nonreporting of some inaccuracies; (2) the services reported improved inventory management without taking any actions; and (3) DOD tended to investigate problems rather than overall inventory conditions. In addition, GAO found that: (1) causative research did not always identify the causes of variances; and (2) security deficiencies included inadequate and improper storage, inoperative detection devices, poorly equipped and trained guards, and poor accountability over sensitive items. GAO believes that DOD needs to determine: (1) how it can better manage its inventories without degrading the military forces' readiness; (2) why unneeded inventory has grown and how to minimize it; and (3) how it can use inventory accuracy and other management information to monitor inventory performance.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.