U.S. Weapons

The Low-Intensity Threat Is Not Necessarily a Low-Technology Threat Gao ID: PEMD-90-13 March 2, 1990

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effectiveness of U.S. defense hardware used in recent low-intensity warfare (LIW) missions.

GAO found that: (1) U.S. defense hardware demonstrated significant limitations; (2) fully adequate, interoperable joint communications equipment was not available for use; (3) precision-guided munitions demonstrated poor success ratios; (4) unguided munitions were more effective, but demonstrated unacceptable vulnerabilities against weak opposition; (5) problems occurred with unsophisticated weapons even when U.S. forces used the newest equipment available; and (6) the variety and significance of hardware problems encountered during LIW could seriously impede future U.S. military operations.

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.