Navy Office Space

Issues on Relocating Selected Commands from the Washington, D.C., Area Gao ID: NSIAD-91-107 May 17, 1991

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined issues related to relocating selected Navy commands from the metropolitan District of Columbia (DC) area, focusing on: (1) the possible impact on command operations; (2) factors relating to relative costs of selected alternatives; and (3) relative quality-of-life factors for employees.

GAO found that advantages and disadvantages of relocation on command operations included: (1) improved condition of office space; (2) temporary loss of productivity due to disruptions of operations; (3) better access to military installations and related support activities; (4) increased difficulty in commands' coordination and interaction with Navy headquarters; (5) increased travel to the DC area; and (6) difficulty in coordinating work of personnel who perform duties for more than one Navy component. GAO also found that: (1) relocating outside of the metropolitan DC area had cost advantages in terms of facility purchasing and leasing and military variable housing allowances; (2) such other factors as moving office equipment and materials, relocating civilian employees, and long-distance travel presented possible cost disadvantages; (3) other factors with cost implications included personnel separations, recruiting and training, parallel operations, mail and telecommunications, productivity changes, and payroll; (4) median costs in the DC area for housing, state and local taxes, food, health care, and child care were higher than in many other areas; and (5) other factors affecting quality-of-life included such amenities as job availability, education, transportation, public safety, and climate.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.