Defense Industrial Base

Industry's Investment in the Critical Technologies Gao ID: NSIAD-92-4 January 15, 1992

For many years, the Defense Department (DOD) has sponsored research and development either directly, by issuing a contract or grant, or indirectly, by allowing contractors to include Independent Research and Development/Bid and Proposal expenses in overhead costs. DOD does not now gather information on whether contractors' Independent Research and Development/Bid and Proposal expenses are addressing technologies considered central to the long-term qualitative superiority of U.S. weapon systems. GAO surveyed 121 contractors in this program; 92 reported that in 1990 they spent $2.9 billion, or almost half, of their expenditures on the goals listed in DOD's Critical Technologies Plan. They also said that most of their firms' total Independent Research and Development/Bid and Proposal work is on near-term development efforts aimed at designing, developing, or testing a new or improved product. Sixty percent or more of the contractors GAO contacted said that recent legislation--Public Law 101-510--will have little or no effect on their investments in critical or environmental technologies, and almost 45 percent believe that the law will have little or no effect on the work being done on dual-use technologies.

GAO found that: (1) DOD does not gather information on whether contractors' IR&D/B&P expenditures address DOD critical technologies; (2) of 121 contractors surveyed, 92 reported they spent a total of $2.9 billion, or 50 percent, of IR&D/B&P expenditures on critical technologies; (3) contractors reported that most IR&D/B&P work was on near-term efforts aimed at designing, developing, or testing a new or improved product, as opposed to basic research; (4) 60 percent of the contractors indicated that the legislation would have little or no effect on their investments in critical or environmental technologies; and (5) 45 percent of the contractors believed that the law would have little or no effect on work related to dual-use technologies.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.