Mission-Critical Systems

Defense Attempting to Address Major Software Challenges Gao ID: IMTEC-93-13 December 24, 1992

Billions of dollars in current and future Defense Department (DOD) weapons and command, control, communications, and intelligence systems depend on high-performance, correctly functioning, real-time computer systems that hold up under severe stresses. Yet the Pentagon's mission-critical systems continue to be plagued by a host of long-standing software development problems, including cost, schedule, and performance shortfalls. This report provides an overview of earlier GAO work on mission-critical systems. Many studies both by GAO and DOD have pointed out a variety of deficiencies, ranging from a lack of management attention to ill-defined system requirements to inadequate testing. Why has this situation persisted for so long? GAO notes that the understanding of software as a product and of software development as a process is not keeping pace with the growing complexity of existing and emerging mission-critical systems. The Pentagon is trying to overcome this dilemma through two main programs--the software action plan working group and the Corporate Information Management initiative. Whether these efforts will solve the military's formidable software problems is uncertain; there are no easy answers.

GAO found that: (1) management, requirements definition, and testing problems contribute to significant schedule delays, cost increases, and performance shortfalls of DOD mission-critical systems; (2) current system acquisition policies do not allow for more incremental or evolutionary development; (3) it is difficult to accurately measure the progress of developing software products; (4) mission-critical systems development attempts are accompanied by serious limitations; (5) the software action plan working group is addressing management issues without a formal written plan to guide their activities; (6) the DOD technology plan is intended to assess DOD software needs for mission-critical systems and to define technology investments over the next 15 years; and (7) the data administration program is attempting to provide consistent, unambiguous, and easily accessible data and minimize the cost and time required to make systems and data compatible.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.