Contract Pricing

Threshold for Analysis of Subcontract Proposals Not Clear Gao ID: NSIAD-92-69 March 20, 1992

This report discusses whether procurement officials consistently and uniformly interpret the dollar threshold at which prime contractors are required to submit analyses of cost or pricing data for prospective subcontracts--subcontract proposals that are not negotiated before prime contract negotiations with the government are completed. GAO found that, in the Defense Department (DOD), procurement officials identify two different dollar thresholds applicable to the federal acquisition requirement that prime contractors analyze cost or pricing data from prospective subcontractors before an agreement is reached on the prime contract price. These different interpretations could result either in the government not receiving analyses needed to establish fair and reasonable contract prices or in contractors being burdened with analyses of subcontract proposals not required by the government. In the short term, clarifying the federal acquisition regulation section on analyses could eliminate confusion about the threshold. For the long term, determining the effects of potential thresholds for analysis of such data could be done in conjunction with the congressional mandated DOD Inspector General review of the effect of the threshold change in the Truth in Negotiations Act.

GAO found that: (1) DOD procurement officials have two different interpretations of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) dollar threshold applicability; (2) some procurement officials interpret FAR as requiring cost or price data analyses if the prospective subcontract exceeds the $500,000 threshold, while others cite another section of FAR to justify a higher threshold of $1 million or both more than $500,000 and more than 10 percent of the prime contract value; and (3) the different interpretations could result in the government not receiving analyses to establish fair contract prices or in contracts being burdened with analyses of subcontract proposals not required.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.