Foreign Aid

Police Training and Assistance Gao ID: NSIAD-92-118 March 5, 1992

In the 1970s, Congress passed legislation prohibiting U.S. agencies from using foreign economic or military assistance funds to aid foreign police. Later, however, Congress granted many exemptions to permit assistance, such as for narcotics control and counterterrorism tactics. GAO could not determine the total extent or cost of U.S. assistance to foreign police because some agencies do not maintain such data. GAO did identify 125 countries that received U.S. training and assistance for their police forces during fiscal year 1990 at a cost of at least $117 million. Former and current U.S. government officials and academics who have been involved with assistance to foreign police forces said that headquarters guidance and coordination of such assistance are limited. Some believe that activities may be inefficiently implemented and unsupportive of overall U.S. policy goals.

GAO found that: (1) Congress enacted legislation in 1973 and 1974 that prohibited the use of foreign economic or military assistance funds for police training and related programs in foreign countries, but subsequently granted numerous exemptions to permit assistance in some countries and in various aspects of police force development, including material and weapons support, force management, narcotics control, and counterterrorism tactics; (3) the 1974 prohibition did not apply to the use of funds by other such agencies as the Departments of Justice or Transportation to train or assist foreign law enforcement personnel; and (4) although some U.S. departments and agencies do not maintain data or regularly report on the total extent or cost of assistance they provide to foreign police, GAO identified 125 countries that received U.S. training and assistance for their police forces at a cost of at least $117 million. GAO also found that current and former U.S. government officials and academic experts involved in assisting foreign police forces stated that the U.S. government lacks: (1) a clear policy on the role of U.S. assistance to police forces in the new and emerging democracies; (2) clearly defined program objectives; (3) a focal point for coordination and decision making; and (4) a means for determining whether individual programs and activities support U.S. policy.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.