National Aero-Space Plane

A Need for Program Direction and Funding Decisions Gao ID: NSIAD-93-207 June 18, 1993

GAO reported in December 1992 that the (1) projected cost for the baseline National Aero-Space Plane program had soared from $3.1 billion to $17 billion, (2) time frames for achieving milestones such as the first flight were uncertain, and (3) development of key technologies had encountered problems. The upshot has been a deferment of the decision to begin phase III. Neither the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Steering Group, nor the Defense Department (DOD) has provided clear direction on what the program's future efforts and objectives should be. The Air Force and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have generally accepted a program office proposal to conduct a series of flight tests before committing to building the X-30, but DOD has not made a final decision on this proposal. Additionally, DOD and NASA have not agreed on the program's current and future funding needs. These conditions hinder efforts to properly plan and execute future technical efforts, initiate required contractual action, and project program costs.

GAO found that: (1) the contractor has made some progress in resolving previously identified problems, but technical uncertainties will not be resolved by the end of phase II; (2) the program office has proposed a series of flight test experiments to address technical and affordability concerns; (3) the proposed experiments have been generally accepted by the Air Force and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), but Department of Defense (DOD) officials have not made a decision on the proposal; (4) the lack of top-level direction and unstable funding has hindered efforts to develop an affordable, executable program; and (5) phase III has been deferred as a result of unresolved cost, schedule, and technical problems.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.