Army Reserve Components

Cost, Readiness, and Personnel Implications of Restructuring Agreement Gao ID: NSIAD-95-76 March 7, 1995

The Defense Department's bottom-up review concluded that the Army's reserve components should be reduced to 575,000 positions by 1999--a 201,000 decrease since fiscal year 1989. In December 1993, the Defense Department announced a major restructuring of the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve. The Offsite Agreement spelled out how personnel reductions would be distributed among the reserve components. This report evaluates (1) the cost of implementing the agreement, (2) the agreement's impact on reserve components' readiness, and (3) reserve components' efforts to absorb displaced personnel.

GAO found that: (1) implementation of the Offsite Agreement could cost over $180 million; (2) the Army's latest cost estimate is about $85 million; (3) GAO believes that the Army's estimate excludes training costs that the Guard will likely incur and includes savings in operating costs that would have resulted regardless of the agreement; (4) it is too early to tell how the agreement will affect readiness for most units; (5) the Guard did not identify specific units that will assume the missions of 20 inactivating Reserve units; another 107 Reserve units are new and have 1 year to establish their readiness ratings; (6) GAO estimated the readiness impact for some units; 13 units will be replaced by units with lower readiness ratings, while 18 units will be replaced by units having the same or higher readiness ratings; (7) the Guard and Reserve have primarily left it up to the reserve component commands and individual units to help affected persons find new units; (8) in three areas already affected by the agreement (the 157th Separate Infantry Brigade, aviation units, and special operations units) some of the commands' and units' initiatives appear to be working well; (9) others, however, appear to discourage the transfer of personnel, even if a transfer would result in a more effective use of their skills; (10) senior and experienced officers and enlisted persons in inactivating units appear to have the most difficulty obtaining positions in other units in the Reserve and the Guard; (11) reserve helicopter pilots and technicians are also experiencing difficulties; and (12) GAO found no evidence indicating that the Special Operations Command will have problems exercising control over the training of Guard special operations forces.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.