DOD Accounting Systems

Efforts to Improve System for Navy Need Overall Structure Gao ID: AIMD-96-99 September 30, 1996

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) is seeking to reduce the number of Navy accounting systems and to enhance a Navy-wide system to account for general fund operations. GAO found that enhancements to DFAS' Standard Accounting and Reporting System were not guided by a target systems architecture--a critical step in any systems development effort. As a result, DFAS' attempts to upgrade the system and correct its shortcomings have not been adequately planned in conjunction with Navy, the system's primary user, to minimize technical and economic risks. As a result, the likelihood has increased that the large investment already made and planned for this project will not provide the Navy with a reliable, fully integrated general accounting system.

GAO found that: (1) DFAS selected the Navy's Standard Accounting and Reporting System (STARS) to serve as the Navy's system for general fund accounting; (2) although believed to be the newest, least deficient, and most advanced of the Navy's 25 existing general fund accounting systems, STARS still has serious shortcomings; (3) savings will accrue as a result of eliminating duplicate and inefficient accounting systems, but could be diminished by the need to provide additional training and technical support; (4) STARS was selected without the benefit of an established architecture, and the lack of a target systems architecture will make it difficult to guide STARS enhancement efforts, estimate enhancement costs, and evaluate alternatives that may be more effective or less expensive; (5) the STARS Plan of Action and Milestones did not include several key analysis tasks and accounting requirements, and several instances of incomplete planning and slipped milestones strongly suggest that STARS enhancements will not meet Department of Defense (DOD) requirements; (6) this piecemeal approach to STARS enhancement could result in costly and time-consuming redesign efforts; and (7) implementation of STARS at field-level activities was not completely successful, since DFAS provided limited training and insufficient technical support.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.