Defense Computers

DOD's Plan for Execution of Simulated Year 2000 Exercises Gao ID: AIMD-99-52R January 29, 1999

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's plan to execute simulated year 2000 exercises, focusing on: (1) the methodology to be used to simulate the year 2000; (2) the potential information that will be collected as a result of implementing the plan; (3) the adequacy of the planned tests; and (4) assessing the impact that the plan will have on military readiness.

GAO noted that: (1) the Secretary of Defense has not yet submitted the operational evaluation program plan to Congress and, therefore, GAO cannot report on the results of the review at this time; (2) Defense has been working on the overall operational evaluation plan but has not yet submitted it as required; (3) on August 7, 1998, the Secretary of Defense requested that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) develop a Joint Year 2000 Operational Evaluation Program plan to be used as part of the joint training exercises program conducted by JCS and the commanders in chief (CINC); (4) since then, JCS has developed guidance and oversight mechanisms for the cinc to conduct operational evaluations and for coordinating these efforts with the military services and Defense agencies; (5) JCS has also developed a database for tracking the results of these evaluations; (6) as of January 26, 1999, the CINCs had plans to conduct 31 operational evaluations through September 1999; (7) initial evaluations at the North American Aerospace Defense Command and the Strategic Command have already been conducted; (8) GAO's strategy for performing future Defense year 2000 work entails assessing selected operational evaluations and related activities performed by Defense; and (9) GAO will brief the congressional committees on the results of the assessments as they are completed.

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.