Defense Transportation

Preliminary Personal Property Pilot Results Are Inconclusive Gao ID: NSIAD-00-52R December 21, 1999

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the progress of the Department of Defense's (DOD) and Military Traffic Management Command's (MTMC) pilot program for the shipment of personal property, focusing on: (1) preliminary pilot results; (2) DOD's assessment of the industry proposal; and (3) MTMC's plan for assessing the pilot's results.

GAO noted that: (1) the preliminary pilot results are inconclusive, but do provide positive indications regarding the pilot program; (2) DOD's progress report included preliminary results that showed improvement over the current system associated with several of the pilot's goals; (3) DOD does not have sufficient data to reach a final conclusion regarding the pilot results; (4) during the first quarter of calendar year 2000, DOD plans to submit a subsequent report that discusses whether the pilot is superior to the existing system; (5) DOD completed its evaluation of the industry proposal and based on available information concluded that it was unlikely to achieve several of the pilot goals; (6) these unmet goals are to provide quality service, adopt corporate business processes, simplify the system, and provide best value moving services to the government; (7) therefore, DOD plans no further evaluation; (8) the methodology being used to evaluate the pilot program should provide a credible analytical basis for determining the success of the pilot; (9) MTMC's evaluation plan addresses most of the methodological weaknesses GAO identified in its earlier report; (10) one remaining issue is to establish baseline transportation and process costs; and (11) according to MTMC officials, the baseline costs will be finalized, evaluated, and reported in a report to be issued during the first quarter of 2000.

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.