Military Base Closures

Unexpended Funds Raise Questions About Fiscal Year 2001 Funding Needs Gao ID: NSIAD-00-170 July 7, 2000

Appropriations for the 1990 base closure account have declined steadily since 1996 as more base closures and realignments have been completed. However, for fiscal year 2001, the Defense Department (DOD) is requesting about $1.2 billion (originally $1.6 billion) in new budget authority, significantly more than the $700 million appropriation in fiscal year 2000. DOD officials reduced the planning estimate by $363 million because they did not believe the larger amount could reasonably be executed in fiscal year 2001. Also, DOD made reductions because prior years' environmental cleanup funds were being spent at a slower pace than anticipated. When the fiscal year 2001 budget was being developed, DOD had about $500 million in reported unobligated balances from previous years' appropriations in the 1990 account, about $114 million of which was appropriated in fiscal year 1993 or earlier. It also had $1.6 billion in reported unliquidated obligations from prior appropriations in the 1990 account, of which about $115 million were appropriated in 1995 or earlier. Most of the $115 million unliquidated funds resulted from environmental cleanup activities that were carried out more slowly than planned, especially by the Air Force. Only the Navy had provided documentation that it had considered unobligated and unliquidated balances in formulating its portion of the budget request. The Army and the Air Force have recently taken steps to reexamine their prior years' unobligated and unliquidated balances.

GAO noted that: (1) appropriations for the 1990 base closure account have declined steadily since 1996 as more base closure and realignment actions have been completed; (2) however, for FY 2001, DOD is requesting about $1.2 billion in new budget authority, significantly more than last year's appropriation of about $700 million; (3) a larger, $1.6-billion budget request was initially planned for FY 2001, but the final $1.2-billion request resulted from several downward adjustments made as the budget request was being developed; (4) of particular note was a decision by DOD officials to reduce the planning estimate for FY 2001 by $363 million because they did not believe the larger amount could be reasonably executed in FY 2001; (5) additional reductions were made primarily because prior years' environmental cleanup funds were being expended at a slower pace than anticipated; (6) at the time the FY 2001 budget estimate was being developed, DOD had about $500 million in reported unobligated balances from previous years' appropriations in the 1990 account, about $114 million of which was appropriated in FY 1998 or earlier; (7) additionally, it had $1.6 billion in reported unliquidated obligations from prior appropriations in the 1990 account, of which about $115 million were appropriated in 1995 or earlier; (8) the majority of the $115 million unliquidated funds resulted from environmental cleanup activities that were carried out more slowly than planned; (9) available data indicate that only the Navy provided documentation that it had considered unobligated and unliquidated balances in formulating its portion of the budget request; (10) in finalizing the FY 2001 budget request, Defense Comptroller officials initially proposed reductions of over $200 million because of concerns over slow budget execution and large amounts of unliquidated obligations, but only $53.4 million of these proposed reductions were ultimately approved; and (11) the Army and the Air Force have recently initiated actions to reexamine their prior years' unobligated and unliquidated balances.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.