FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
Gao ID: GAO-04-930R July 9, 2004
Under section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (P.L. 106-398), the Department of Defense (DOD) is to submit an annual report to Congress on its Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program no later than the first Monday in February of each year. The report should include a 5-year plan that discusses the amount and purpose of funding needed over the term of the plan and a description of efforts conducted by the United States to ensure that CTR assistance is fully accounted for and used for its intended purposes. The act requires the Comptroller General to assess this 5-year plan and the description of efforts to account for CTR assistance within 90 days of the report's submission to Congress. The Department submitted its CTR annual report for fiscal year 2005 to Congress in early February 2004, and we briefed Congressional staff on April 29, 2004. We analyzed the 2005 report to determine whether (1) the 5-year plan addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, (2) the accountability section addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, and (3) past GAO recommendations have been adopted.
We found that the 5-year plan addressed the legislative requirements by setting forth funding information for the term of the plan and the purpose of those funds. We also confirmed with project managers that, for the eight projects we reviewed in detail, the information provided in the report was generally accurate. We found that the accountability section addressed all legislative requirements. We found that the information was generally accurate and complete and included the concerns raised in project trip reports and audit and examinations. We found that DOD has taken action on 13 of 14 GAO recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information over the last 9 years. DOD has not implemented our recommendation that the annual report incorporate key federal strategic planning elements. Specifically, the report did not include annual performance goals linked to long-term goals, information on external factors that could affect the achievement of these goals, and plans for revising program goals, all of which had been developed by CTR program managers. However, in its response to our July 2003 report, DOD stated that the legislation does not require reporting on these elements in its annual CTR report. Since 1994, DOD has implemented all but one of GAO's recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information and in so doing has significantly improved the quality of its annual reporting to Congress on the CTR program.
GAO-04-930R, FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-04-930R
entitled 'FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program' which was released on July 09, 2004.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
July 9, 2004:
The Honorable John Warner:
Chairman:
The Honorable Carl Levin:
Ranking Minority Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
United States Senate:
The Honorable Duncan Hunter:
Chairman:
The Honorable Ike Skelton:
Ranking Minority Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
House of Representatives:
Subject: FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program:
Under section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2001 (P.L. 106-398), the Department of Defense (DOD) is to submit
an annual report to Congress on its Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR)
program no later than the first Monday in February of each year. The
report should include a 5-year plan that discusses the amount and
purpose of funding needed over the term of the plan and a description
of efforts conducted by the United States to ensure that CTR assistance
is fully accounted for and used for its intended purposes. The act
requires the Comptroller General to assess this 5-year plan and the
description of efforts to account for CTR assistance within 90 days of
the report's submission to Congress. The Department submitted its CTR
annual report for fiscal year 2005 to Congress in early February 2004,
and we briefed your staff on April 29, 2004.[Footnote 1]
We analyzed the 2005 report to determine whether (1) the 5-year plan
addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information,
(2) the accountability section addresses legislative requirements and
presents accurate information, and (3) past GAO recommendations have
been adopted. Enclosed is information provided to your staff presenting
our assessment of the CTR annual report submitted for fiscal year 2005
(see enclosure).
We found that the 5-year plan addressed the legislative requirements by
setting forth funding information for the term of the plan and the
purpose of those funds. We also confirmed with project managers that,
for the eight projects we reviewed in detail, the information provided
in the report was generally accurate. In addition, we examined the
source documents that supported the data in the published report and
found that the published data were generally well supported.
We found that the accountability section addressed all legislative
requirements. It described the condition and location of CTR-furnished
equipment, discussed the status of contracts and services and the
methods used to ensure that CTR aid is used for the purposes intended,
determined whether the assistance provided has been used effectively
and efficiently, and described the audits and examinations planned for
the next year. We found that the information was generally accurate and
complete and included the concerns raised in project trip reports and
audit and examinations.
We found that DOD has taken action on 13 of 14 GAO recommendations
regarding the reporting of CTR program information over the last 9
years. For example, in our review of DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual
report, we recommended that the Secretary of Defense integrate the 5-
year plan and accountability sections of the report.[Footnote 2] DOD
modified the fiscal year 2005 annual report to comply with our
recommendation. The report now integrates the information that was
found separately in the 5-year plan and the accountability section.
This presentation provides relevant project information in one
location, making it easier to understand the progress and problems of
each project.
DOD has not implemented our recommendation that the annual report
incorporate key federal strategic planning elements. In July 2003, we
found that DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual report lacked a discussion of
key strategic planning elements that could help congressional decision
makers in their annual CTR budget deliberations. Specifically, the
report did not include annual performance goals linked to long-term
goals, information on external factors that could affect the
achievement of these goals, and plans for revising program goals, all
of which had been developed by CTR program managers. However, in its
response to our July 2003 report, DOD stated that the legislation does
not require reporting on these elements in its annual CTR report.
During our audit work for this report, DOD officials stated that the
Department would not implement our recommendation without specific
congressional direction to do so.
Since 1994, DOD has implemented all but one of GAO's recommendations
regarding the reporting of CTR program information and in so doing has
significantly improved the quality of its annual reporting to Congress
on the CTR program. Based on the quality and timeliness of the fiscal
year 2005 annual report, Congress may wish to rescind the requirement
that GAO review the CTR report annually, provided that the fiscal year
2006 annual report is delivered on time and is reviewed favorably.
We performed our work in Washington, D.C., from February 2004 through
May 2004 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing
standards.
DOD did not comment on a draft of this report that we provided.
We are sending copies of this report to the Honorable Donald Rumsfeld,
Secretary of Defense, and to interested congressional committees. We
also will make copies available to others upon request. This report
will also be available at no charge on the GAO Web site at http://
www.gao.gov.
If you or your staff have any questions regarding this report, please
contact me at (202) 512-8979 or christoffj@gao.gov. David Maurer,
Claude Adrien, Hynek Kalkus, Beth Hoffman León, and Josie Sigl also
made key contributions to this report.
Signed by:
Joseph A. Christoff:
Director, International Affairs and Trade:
Enclosure:
[See PDF for image]
[End of slide presentation]
(320281):
FOOTNOTES
[1] We refer to the section of the CTR annual report for fiscal year
2004 titled "Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program implementation
plan for FY 2004" as the 5-year plan. We refer to the section titled
"accounting for Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program assistance
to states of the former Soviet Union (FSU) conducted during FY 2002" as
the accountability section. These sections were consolidated in the FY
2005 report at GAO's recommendation.
[2] See U.S. General Accounting Office, FY 2004 Annual Report on the
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, GAO-03-1008R (Washington, D.C.:
July 18, 2003).