FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program

Gao ID: GAO-04-930R July 9, 2004

Under section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (P.L. 106-398), the Department of Defense (DOD) is to submit an annual report to Congress on its Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program no later than the first Monday in February of each year. The report should include a 5-year plan that discusses the amount and purpose of funding needed over the term of the plan and a description of efforts conducted by the United States to ensure that CTR assistance is fully accounted for and used for its intended purposes. The act requires the Comptroller General to assess this 5-year plan and the description of efforts to account for CTR assistance within 90 days of the report's submission to Congress. The Department submitted its CTR annual report for fiscal year 2005 to Congress in early February 2004, and we briefed Congressional staff on April 29, 2004. We analyzed the 2005 report to determine whether (1) the 5-year plan addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, (2) the accountability section addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, and (3) past GAO recommendations have been adopted.

We found that the 5-year plan addressed the legislative requirements by setting forth funding information for the term of the plan and the purpose of those funds. We also confirmed with project managers that, for the eight projects we reviewed in detail, the information provided in the report was generally accurate. We found that the accountability section addressed all legislative requirements. We found that the information was generally accurate and complete and included the concerns raised in project trip reports and audit and examinations. We found that DOD has taken action on 13 of 14 GAO recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information over the last 9 years. DOD has not implemented our recommendation that the annual report incorporate key federal strategic planning elements. Specifically, the report did not include annual performance goals linked to long-term goals, information on external factors that could affect the achievement of these goals, and plans for revising program goals, all of which had been developed by CTR program managers. However, in its response to our July 2003 report, DOD stated that the legislation does not require reporting on these elements in its annual CTR report. Since 1994, DOD has implemented all but one of GAO's recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information and in so doing has significantly improved the quality of its annual reporting to Congress on the CTR program.



GAO-04-930R, FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-04-930R entitled 'FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program' which was released on July 09, 2004. This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. July 9, 2004: The Honorable John Warner: Chairman: The Honorable Carl Levin: Ranking Minority Member: Committee on Armed Services: United States Senate: The Honorable Duncan Hunter: Chairman: The Honorable Ike Skelton: Ranking Minority Member: Committee on Armed Services: House of Representatives: Subject: FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program: Under section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (P.L. 106-398), the Department of Defense (DOD) is to submit an annual report to Congress on its Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program no later than the first Monday in February of each year. The report should include a 5-year plan that discusses the amount and purpose of funding needed over the term of the plan and a description of efforts conducted by the United States to ensure that CTR assistance is fully accounted for and used for its intended purposes. The act requires the Comptroller General to assess this 5-year plan and the description of efforts to account for CTR assistance within 90 days of the report's submission to Congress. The Department submitted its CTR annual report for fiscal year 2005 to Congress in early February 2004, and we briefed your staff on April 29, 2004.[Footnote 1] We analyzed the 2005 report to determine whether (1) the 5-year plan addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, (2) the accountability section addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, and (3) past GAO recommendations have been adopted. Enclosed is information provided to your staff presenting our assessment of the CTR annual report submitted for fiscal year 2005 (see enclosure). We found that the 5-year plan addressed the legislative requirements by setting forth funding information for the term of the plan and the purpose of those funds. We also confirmed with project managers that, for the eight projects we reviewed in detail, the information provided in the report was generally accurate. In addition, we examined the source documents that supported the data in the published report and found that the published data were generally well supported. We found that the accountability section addressed all legislative requirements. It described the condition and location of CTR-furnished equipment, discussed the status of contracts and services and the methods used to ensure that CTR aid is used for the purposes intended, determined whether the assistance provided has been used effectively and efficiently, and described the audits and examinations planned for the next year. We found that the information was generally accurate and complete and included the concerns raised in project trip reports and audit and examinations. We found that DOD has taken action on 13 of 14 GAO recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information over the last 9 years. For example, in our review of DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual report, we recommended that the Secretary of Defense integrate the 5- year plan and accountability sections of the report.[Footnote 2] DOD modified the fiscal year 2005 annual report to comply with our recommendation. The report now integrates the information that was found separately in the 5-year plan and the accountability section. This presentation provides relevant project information in one location, making it easier to understand the progress and problems of each project. DOD has not implemented our recommendation that the annual report incorporate key federal strategic planning elements. In July 2003, we found that DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual report lacked a discussion of key strategic planning elements that could help congressional decision makers in their annual CTR budget deliberations. Specifically, the report did not include annual performance goals linked to long-term goals, information on external factors that could affect the achievement of these goals, and plans for revising program goals, all of which had been developed by CTR program managers. However, in its response to our July 2003 report, DOD stated that the legislation does not require reporting on these elements in its annual CTR report. During our audit work for this report, DOD officials stated that the Department would not implement our recommendation without specific congressional direction to do so. Since 1994, DOD has implemented all but one of GAO's recommendations regarding the reporting of CTR program information and in so doing has significantly improved the quality of its annual reporting to Congress on the CTR program. Based on the quality and timeliness of the fiscal year 2005 annual report, Congress may wish to rescind the requirement that GAO review the CTR report annually, provided that the fiscal year 2006 annual report is delivered on time and is reviewed favorably. We performed our work in Washington, D.C., from February 2004 through May 2004 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. DOD did not comment on a draft of this report that we provided. We are sending copies of this report to the Honorable Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and to interested congressional committees. We also will make copies available to others upon request. This report will also be available at no charge on the GAO Web site at http:// www.gao.gov. If you or your staff have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at (202) 512-8979 or christoffj@gao.gov. David Maurer, Claude Adrien, Hynek Kalkus, Beth Hoffman León, and Josie Sigl also made key contributions to this report. Signed by: Joseph A. Christoff: Director, International Affairs and Trade: Enclosure: [See PDF for image] [End of slide presentation] (320281): FOOTNOTES [1] We refer to the section of the CTR annual report for fiscal year 2004 titled "Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program implementation plan for FY 2004" as the 5-year plan. We refer to the section titled "accounting for Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program assistance to states of the former Soviet Union (FSU) conducted during FY 2002" as the accountability section. These sections were consolidated in the FY 2005 report at GAO's recommendation. [2] See U.S. General Accounting Office, FY 2004 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, GAO-03-1008R (Washington, D.C.: July 18, 2003).

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.