Army Corps of Engineers
Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project Gao ID: GAO-05-1050T September 28, 2005The greatest natural threat posed to the New Orleans area is from hurricane-induced storm surges, waves, and rainfalls. A hurricane surge that can inundate coastal lowlands is the most destructive characteristic of hurricanes and accounts for most of the lives lost from hurricanes. Hurricane surge heights along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts can exceed 20 feet. The effects of Hurricane Katrina flooded a large part of New Orleans and breached the levees that are part of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project. This project, first authorized in 1965, was designed to protect the lowlands in the Lake Pontchartrain tidal basin from flooding by hurricane-induced sea surges and rainfall. GAO was asked to provide information on (1) the purpose and history of the Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project and (2) funding of the project. GAO is not making any recommendations in this testimony.
Congress first authorized the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project in the Flood Control Act of 1965. The project was to construct a series of control structures, concrete floodwalls, and levees to provide hurricane protection to areas around Lake Pontchartrain. The project, when designed, was expected to take about 13 years to complete and cost about $85 million. Although federally authorized, it was a joint federal, state, and local effort. The original project designs were developed based on the equivalent of what is now called a fast-moving Category 3 hurricane that might strike the coastal Louisiana region once in 200-300 years. As GAO reported in 1976 and 1982, since the beginning of the project, the Corps has encountered project delays and cost increases due to design changes caused by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal challenges, and local opposition to portions of the project. As a result, in 1982, project costs had grown to $757 million and the expected completion date had slipped to 2008. None of the changes made to the project, however, are believed to have had any role in the levee breaches recently experienced as the alternative design selected was expected to provide the same level of protection. In fact, Corps officials believe that flooding would have been worse if the original proposed design had been built. When Hurricane Katrina struck, the project, including about 125 miles of levees, was estimated to be from 60-90 percent complete in different areas with an estimated completion date for the whole project of 2015. The floodwalls along the drainage canals that were breached were complete when the hurricane hit. The current estimated cost of construction for the completed project is $738 million with the federal share being $528 million and the local share $210 million. Federal allocations for the project were $458 million as of the enactment of the fiscal year 2005 federal appropriation. This represents 87 percent of the federal government's responsibility of $528 million with about $70 million remaining to complete the project. Over the last 10 fiscal years (1996-2005), federal appropriations have totaled about $128.6 million and Corps reprogramming actions resulted in another $13 million being made available to the project. During that time, appropriations have generally declined from about $15-20 million annually in the earlier years to about $5-7 million in the last three fiscal years. While this may not be unusual given the state of completion of the project, the Corps' project fact sheet from May 2005 noted that the President's budget request for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, and the appropriated amount for fiscal year 2005 were insufficient to fund new construction contracts. The Corps had also stated that it could spend $20 million in fiscal year 2006 on the project if the funds were available. The Corps noted that several levees had settled and needed to be raised to provide the level of protection intended by the design.
GAO-05-1050T, Army Corps of Engineers: Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-1050T
entitled 'Army Corps of Engineers: Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity
Hurricane Protection Project' which was released on September 28, 2005.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Testimony:
Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on
Appropriations, House of Representatives:
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT:
September 28, 2005:
Army Corps of Engineers:
Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project:
Statement of Anu Mittal, Director, Natural Resources and Environment:
GAO-05-1050T:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-05-1050T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on
Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, House of
Representatives:
Why GAO Did This Study:
The greatest natural threat posed to the New Orleans area is from
hurricane-induced storm surges, waves, and rainfalls. A hurricane surge
that can inundate coastal lowlands is the most destructive
characteristic of hurricanes and accounts for most of the lives lost
from hurricanes. Hurricane surge heights along the Gulf and Atlantic
coasts can exceed 20 feet. The effects of Hurricane Katrina flooded a
large part of New Orleans and breeched the levees that are part of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity,
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project. This project, first authorized
in 1965, was designed to protect the lowlands in the Lake Pontchartrain
tidal basin from flooding by hurricane-induced sea surges and rainfall.
GAO was asked to provide information on (1) the purpose and history of
the Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection
Project and (2) funding of the project.
GAO is not making any recommendations in this testimony.
What GAO Found:
Congress first authorized the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity,
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project in the Flood Control Act of
1965. The project was to construct a series of control structures,
concrete floodwalls, and levees to provide hurricane protection to
areas around Lake Pontchartrain. The project, when designed, was
expected to take about 13 years to complete and cost about $85 million.
Although federally authorized, it was a joint federal, state, and local
effort.
The original project designs were developed based on the equivalent of
what is now called a fast-moving Category 3 hurricane that might strike
the coastal Louisiana region once in 200-300 years. As GAO reported in
1976 and 1982, since the beginning of the project, the Corps has
encountered project delays and cost increases due to design changes
caused by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal challenges,
and local opposition to portions of the project. As a result, in 1982,
project costs had grown to $757 million and the expected completion
date had slipped to 2008. None of the changes made to the project,
however, are believed to have had any role in the levee breaches
recently experienced as the alternative design selected was expected to
provide the same level of protection. In fact, Corps officials believe
that flooding would have been worse if the original proposed design had
been built. When Hurricane Katrina struck, the project, including about
125 miles of levees, was estimated to be from 60-90 percent complete in
different areas with an estimated completion date for the whole project
of 2015. The floodwalls along the drainage canals that were breached
were complete when the hurricane hit.
The current estimated cost of construction for the completed project is
$738 million with the federal share being $528 million and the local
share $210 million. Federal allocations for the project were $458
million as of the enactment of the fiscal year 2005 federal
appropriation. This represents 87 percent of the federal government‘s
responsibility of $528 million with about $70 million remaining to
complete the project. Over the last 10 fiscal years (1996-2005),
federal appropriations have totaled about $128.6 million and Corps
reprogramming actions resulted in another $13 million being made
available to the project. During that time, appropriations have
generally declined from about $15-20 million annually in the earlier
years to about $5-7 million in the last three fiscal years. While this
may not be unusual given the state of completion of the project, the
Corps‘ project fact sheet from May 2005 noted that the President‘s
budget request for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, and the appropriated
amount for fiscal year 2005 were insufficient to fund new construction
contracts. The Corps had also stated that it could spend $20 million in
fiscal year 2006 on the project if the funds were available. The Corps
noted that several levees had settled and needed to be raised to
provide the level of protection intended by the design.
www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-1050T.
To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on
the link above. For more information, contact Anu Mittal at
(202) 512-3841 or mittala@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
We are pleased to be here today to discuss the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane
Protection Project. This project, first authorized in 1965, was
designed to protect the lowlands in the Lake Pontchartrain tidal basin
within the greater New Orleans metropolitan area from flooding by
hurricane-induced sea surges and rainfall. As you know, the effects of
Hurricane Katrina breeched the levees that are part of this project and
flooded a large part of New Orleans.
In my testimony, I will discuss (1) the purpose and history of the
project and (2) funding of the project. To conduct this work, we
reviewed GAO's past reports on the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity,
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project and on the Corps' flood control
efforts in general.[Footnote 1] We interviewed Corps personnel
responsible for the Lake Pontchartrain project to obtain information on
the Corps funding of the project and its current status. We did the
work reflected in this statement during September 2005 in accordance
with generally accepted government auditing standards.
In summary, the Lake Pontchartrain hurricane project was designed to
protect areas around the lake from flooding caused by a storm surge or
rainfall associated with a standard project hurricane, which is roughly
the same as what is now classified as a fast moving Category 3
hurricane. The project, when designed in the mid-1960s, was expected to
take about 13 years to complete and cost about $85 million. Over the
years, the project has undergone some significant design changes as a
result of a successful court challenge, local opposition to certain
aspects of the proposed design, and changed Corps thinking about the
most cost-effective approach. None of these changes, however, are
believed to have had any role in the levee breaches recently
experienced as the alternative design selected was expected to provide
the same level of protection. In fact, Corps staff believes that
flooding would have been worse if the original proposed design had been
built. As of early 2005, the project was not expected to be completed
until 2015--nearly 50 years after it was first authorized--and cost
about $738 million, much of the cost increase is due to inflation over
the years and changes to the scope and design of the project. In recent
years, questions have been raised about the ability of the project to
protect the New Orleans area from hurricanes greater than Category 3.
This issue was only beginning to be studied by the Corps when Hurricane
Katrina hit the area in August 2005.
Background:
Since its founding in 1718, the city of New Orleans and its surrounding
areas have been subject to numerous floods from the Mississippi River
and hurricanes. The greater New Orleans metropolitan area, composed of
Orleans, Jefferson, St. Charles, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany parishes,
sits in the tidal lowlands of Lake Pontchartrain and is bordered
generally on its southern side by the Mississippi River. Lake
Pontchartrain is a tidal basin about 640 square miles in area that
connects with the Gulf of Mexico through Lake Borgne and the
Mississippi Sound.
While the area has historically experienced many river floods, a series
of levees and other flood control structures built over the years were
expected to greatly reduce that threat. The greatest natural threat
posed to the New Orleans area continues to be from hurricane-induced
storm surges, waves, and rainfalls. Several hurricanes have struck the
area over the years including Hurricane Betsy in 1965, Hurricane
Camille in 1969, and Hurricane Lili in 2002. The hurricane surge that
can inundate coastal lowlands is the most destructive characteristic of
hurricanes and accounts for most of the lives lost from hurricanes.
Hurricane surge heights along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts can range up
to 20 feet or more and there is growing concern that continuing losses
of coastal wetlands and settlement of land in New Orleans has made the
area more vulnerable to such storms. Because of such threats, a series
of control structures, concrete floodwalls, and levees, was proposed
for the area along Lake Pontchartrain in the 1960s.
Purpose and History of Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Flood Control
Project:
Congress first authorized construction of the Lake Pontchartrain and
Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project in the Flood Control
Act of 1965[Footnote 2] to provide hurricane protection to areas around
the lake in the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, St. Bernard, and St.
Charles. Although federally authorized, it was a joint federal, state,
and local effort with the federal government paying 70 percent of the
costs and the state and local interests paying 30 percent. The Corps
was responsible for project design and construction and local interests
were responsible for maintenance of levees and flood controls. The
original project design, known as the barrier plan, included a series
of levees along the lakefront, concrete floodwalls along the Inner
Harbor Navigation Canal, and control structures, including barriers and
flood control gates located at the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Pass
areas. These structures were intended to prevent storm surges from
entering Lake Pontchartrain and overflowing the levees along the
lakefront. The original lakefront levees were planned to be from 9.3
feet to 13.5 feet high depending on the topography of the area directly
in front of the levees.
This project plan was selected over another alternative, known as the
high-level plan, which excluded the barriers and flood control gates at
the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Pass complexes and instead employed
higher levees ranging from 16 feet to 18.5 feet high along the
lakefront to prevent storm surges from inundating the protected areas.
In the 1960s, the barrier plan was favored because it was believed to
be less expensive and quicker to construct. As explained later in my
statement, this decision was reversed in the mid-1980s. The cost
estimate for the original project was $85 million (in 1961 dollars) and
the estimated completion date was 1978.
Figure 1: Flood Protection Control Levees In and Around New Orleans,
LA.
[See PDF for image]
[End of figure]
The original project designs were developed to combat a hurricane that
might strike the coastal Louisiana region once in 200-300 years. The
basis for this was the standard project hurricane developed by the
Corps with the assistance of the United States Weather Bureau (now the
National Weather Service). The model was intended to represent the most
severe meteorological conditions considered reasonably characteristic
for that region. The model projected a storm roughly equivalent to a
fast-moving Category 3 hurricane. A Category 3 hurricane has winds of
111-130 miles per hour and can be expected to cause some structural
damage from winds and flooding near the coast from the storm surge and
inland from rains.
Even before construction began on the project, it became evident that
some changes to the project plan were needed. Based on updated Weather
Bureau data on the severity of hurricanes, the Corps determined that
the levees along the three main drainage canals, that drain water from
New Orleans into Lake Pontchartrain, would need to be raised to protect
against storm surges from the lake. The need for this additional work
became apparent when Hurricane Betsy flooded portions of the city in
September 1965.
During the first 17 years of construction on the barrier plan, the
Corps continued to face project delays and cost increases due to design
changes caused by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal
challenges, and local opposition to various aspects of the project. For
example, foundation problems were encountered during construction of
levees and floodwalls which increased construction time; delays were
also encountered in obtaining rights-of-ways from local interests who
did not agree with all portions of the plan. By 1981, cost estimates
had grown to $757 million for the barrier plan, not including the cost
of any needed work along the drainage canals, and project completion
had slipped to 2008. At that time, about $171 million had been made
available to the project and the project was considered about 50
percent complete, mostly for the lakefront levees which were at least
partially constructed in all areas and capable of providing some flood
protection although from a smaller hurricane than that envisioned in
the plan.
More importantly, during the 1970s, some features of the barrier plan
were facing significant opposition from environmentalists and local
groups who were concerned about environmental damages to the lake as
well as inadequate protection from some aspects of the project. The
threat of litigation by environmentalists delayed the project and local
opposition to building the control complexes at Rigolets and Chef
Menteur had the potential to seriously reduce the overall protection
provided by the project. This opposition culminated in a December 1977
court decision[Footnote 3] that enjoined the Corps from constructing
the barrier complexes, and certain other parts of the project until a
revised environmental impact statement was prepared and accepted. After
the court order, the Corps decided to change course and completed a
project reevaluation report and prepared a draft revised Environmental
Impact Statement in the mid-1980s that recommended abandoning the
barrier plan and shifting to the high-level plan originally considered
in the early 1960s. Local sponsors executed new agreements to assure
their share of the non-federal contribution to the revised project.
These changes are not believed to have had any role in the levee
breaches recently experienced as the high-level design selected was
expected to provide the same level of protection as the original
barrier design. In fact, Corps staff believe that flooding would have
been worse if the original proposed design had been built because the
storm surge would likely have gone over the top of the barrier and
floodgates, flooded Lake Pontchartain, and gone over the original lower
levees planned for the lakefront area as part of the barrier
plan.[Footnote 4] As of 2005, the project as constructed or being
constructed included about 125 miles of levees and the following major
features:
* New levee north of Highway U.S. 61 from the Bonnet Carré Spillway
East Guide Levee to the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary:
* Floodwall along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary:
* Enlarged levee along the Jefferson Parish lakefront:
* Enlarged levee along the Orleans Parish lakefront:
* Levees, floodwalls, and flood proofed bridges along the 17th Street,
Orleans Avenue and London Avenue drainage canals:
* Levees from the New Orleans lakefront to the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway:
* Enlarged levees along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet:
* New levee around the Chalmette area.
The project also includes a mitigation dike on the west shore of Lake
Pontchartrain.
The current estimated cost of construction for the completed project is
$738 million with the federal share being $528 million and the local
share $210 million. The estimated completion date as of May 2005 for
the whole project was 2015. The project was estimated to be from 60-90
percent complete in different areas. The work in Orleans Parish was
estimated to be 90 percent complete with some work remaining for bridge
replacement along the Orleans Avenue and London Avenue drainage canals.
The floodwalls along the canals, where the recent breaches occurred,
were complete. Jefferson Parish work was estimated to be 70 percent
complete with work continuing on flood proofing the Hammond Highway
bridge over 17th Street and two lakefront levee enlargements. Estimated
completion for that work was 2010. In the Chalmette area work was
estimated to be 90 percent complete with some levee enlargement work
and floodwall work remaining. In St. Charles Parish work was 60 percent
complete with some gaps still remaining in the levees. Closure of these
gaps was scheduled by September 2005.
Recent Funding History for the Project:
Federal allocations for the project totaled $458 million as of the
enactment of the fiscal year 2005 federal appropriation. This
represents 87 percent of the Federal government's responsibility of
$528 million with about $70 million remaining to complete the project
in 2015. Over the last 10 fiscal years (1996-2005), federal
appropriations have totaled about $128.6 million and Corps
reprogramming actions resulted in another $13 million being made
available to the project. During that time, appropriations have
generally declined from about $15-20 million annually in the earlier
years to about $5-7 million in the last three fiscal years. While this
may not be unusual given the state of completion of the project, the
Corps' project fact sheet from May 2005 noted that the President's
Budget request for fiscal years 2005 and 2006 and the appropriated
amount for fiscal year 2005 were insufficient to fund new construction
contracts. Among the construction efforts that could not be funded,
according to the Corps, were the following:
* Levee enlargements in all four parishes:
* Pumping station flood protection in Orleans Parish:
* Floodgates and a floodwall in St. Charles Parish:
* Bridge replacement in Orleans Parish.
The Corps had also stated that it could spend $20 million in fiscal
year 2006 on the project if the funds were available. The Corps noted
that several levees had settled and needed to be raised to provide the
design-level of protection. For the last few years, the project
generally received the amount of funds appropriated to it and was not
adversely affected by any Corps reprogramming actions.
In recent years, questions have been raised about the ability of the
project to withstand larger hurricanes than it was designed for, such
as a Category 4 or 5, or even a slow-moving Category 3 hurricane that
lingered over the area and produced higher levels of rainfall. Along
this line, the Corps completed in 2002 a reconnaissance or pre-
feasibility study on whether to strengthen hurricane protection along
the Louisiana coast. A full feasibility study was estimated to take at
least five years to complete and cost about $8 million. In March 2005,
the Corps reported that it was allocating $79,000 to complete a
management plan for the feasibility study and a cost-share agreement
with local sponsors. The President's fiscal year 2006 budget request
did not include any funds for the feasibility project.
In closing, the Lake Pontchartrain hurricane project has been under
construction for nearly 40 years, much longer than originally
envisioned and at much greater cost, although much of that can be
attributed to inflation over these years, and the project is still not
complete. Whether the state of completion of the project played a role
in the flooding of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in
August 2005 is still to be determined as are issues related to whether
a project designed to protect against Category 4 or 5 hurricanes would
or could have prevented this catastrophe.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared testimony. We would be happy
to respond to any questions that you or Members of the Subcommittee may
have.
GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
For further information on this testimony, please contact Anu Mittal at
(202) 512-3841 or mittala@gao.gov. Individuals making contributions to
this testimony included Ed Zadjura, Ken Lightner, Omari Norman, John
Delicath, and Patrick Castellano:
FOOTNOTES
[1] GAO, Cost, Schedule, And Performance Problems Of The Lake
Pontchartrain And Vicinity, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection Project,
GAO/PSAD-76-161 (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 31, 1976) and GAO, Improved
Planning Needed By The Corps Of Engineers To Resolve Environmental,
Technical, And Financial Issues On The Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane
Protection Project, GAO/MASAD-82-39 (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 17, 1982).
[2] Pub. L. No. 89-298, § 204, 79 Stat. 1073, 1077.
[3] Save Our Wetlands v. Rush, Civ. A. No. 75-3710 (E.D. La. Dec. 30,
1977).
[4] The lakefront levees in the original barrier plan were 9.5 feet to
13.5 feet high compared to the 16 feet to 18.5 feet high levees built
along the lakefront as part of the high-level plan.
