Global War on Terrorism
Reported Obligations for the Department of Defense Gao ID: GAO-09-449R March 30, 2009Since 2001, Congress has provided the Department of Defense (DOD) with about $808 billion in supplemental and annual appropriations, as of March 2009, primarily for military operations in support of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). DOD's reported annual obligations for GWOT have shown a steady increase from about $0.2 billion in fiscal year 2001 to about $162.4 billion in fiscal year 2008. For fiscal year 2009, Congress provided DOD with about $65.9 billion in supplemental appropriations for GWOT as of March 2009 and the President plans on requesting an additional $75.5 billion in supplemental appropriations for GWOT for the remainder of the fiscal year. A total of $31.0 billion has been obligated in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 through December 2008. The United States' commitments to GWOT will likely involve the continued investment of significant resources, requiring decision makers to consider difficult trade-offs as the nation faces an increasing long-range fiscal challenge. The magnitude of future costs will depend on several direct and indirect cost variables and, in some cases, decisions that have not yet been made. DOD's future costs will likely be affected by the pace and duration of operations, the types of facilities needed to support troops overseas, redeployment plans, and the amount of equipment to be repaired or replaced. DOD compiles and reports monthly and cumulative incremental obligations incurred to support GWOT in a monthly report commonly called the Contingency Operations Status of Funds Report. DOD leadership uses this report, along with other information, to advise Congress on the costs of the war and to formulate future GWOT budget requests. DOD reports these obligations by appropriation, contingency operation, and military service or defense agency. DOD has prepared monthly reports on the obligations incurred for its involvement in GWOT since fiscal year 2001. Section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 requires GAO to submit quarterly updates to Congress on the costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom based on DOD's monthly cost-of-war reports. This report, which responds to this requirement, contains our analysis of DOD's reported obligations for military operations in support of GWOT through December 2008. Specifically, we assessed (1) DOD's cumulative appropriations and reported obligations for military operations in support of GWOT and (2) DOD's fiscal year 2009 reported obligations from October 2008 through December 2008, the latest data available for GWOT by military service and appropriation account.
As of December 2008, Congress has appropriated a total of about $808 billion primarily for GWOT operations since 2001. Of that amount, about $187 billion has been provided for fiscal year 2008 and about $65.9 billion has been appropriated for use in fiscal year 2009. DOD plans on requesting an additional $75.5 billion in supplemental funds for fiscal year 2009. DOD has reported obligations of about $685.7 billion for military operations in support of the war from fiscal year 2001 through fiscal year 2008 and for fiscal year 2009 (October through December 2008). The $122.3 billion difference between DOD's appropriations and reported obligations can generally be attributed to multiyear funding for procurement; military construction; and research, development, test, and evaluation from previous GWOT-related appropriations that have yet to be obligated; and obligations for classified and other items, which DOD considers to be non-GWOT related, that are not reported in DOD's costof- war reports. DOD's reported obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom have consistently increased each fiscal year since operations began. The increases in reported obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom are in part due to continued costs for military personnel, such as military pay and allowances for mobilized reservists, and for rising operation and maintenance expenses, such as higher contract costs for housing, food, and services and higher fuel costs. In contrast, DOD's reported obligations for Operation Noble Eagle have consistently decreased since fiscal year 2003, largely because of the completion of repairs to the Pentagon and upgrades in security at military installations that were onetime costs, as well as a reduction in combat air patrols and in the number of reserve personnel guarding government installations. Reported obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom have ranged from $10.3 billion to $20.1 billion each fiscal year since 2003. Recent increases in reported obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom are in part caused by higher troop levels in Afghanistan, the costs associated with training Afghan security forces, and the need to repair and replace equipment after several years of ongoing operations. DOD's reported obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom have consistently increased each fiscal year since operations began. The increases in reported obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom are in part due to continued costs for military personnel, such as military pay and allowances for mobilized reservists, and for rising operation and maintenance expenses, such as higher contract costs for housing, food, and services and higher fuel costs. In addition, the need to repair and replace equipment because of the harsh combat and environmental conditions in theater and the ongoing costs associated with the surge strategy announced in January 2007, which provided for the deployment of additional troops, have further increased obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom. In contrast, DOD's reported obligations for Operation Noble Eagle have consistently decreased since fiscal year 2003, largely because of the completion of repairs to the Pentagon and upgrades in security at military installations that were onetime costs, as well as a reduction in combat air patrols and in the number of reserve personnel guarding government installations. Reported obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom have ranged from $10.3 billion to $20.1 billion each fiscal year since 2003. Recent increases in reported obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom are in part caused by higher troop levels in Afghanistan, the costs associated with training Afghan security forces, and the need to repair and replace equipment after several years of ongoing operations.
GAO-09-449R, Global War on Terrorism: Reported Obligations for the Department of Defense
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-09-449R
entitled 'Global War on Terrorism: Reported Obligations for the
Department of Defense' which was released on March 30, 2009.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
GAO-09-449R:
United States Government Accountability Office:
Washington, DC 20548:
March 30, 2009:
Congressional Committees:
Subject: Global War on Terrorism: Reported Obligations for the
Department of Defense:
Since 2001, Congress has provided the Department of Defense (DOD) with
about $808 billion in supplemental and annual appropriations, as of
March 2009, primarily for military operations in support of the Global
War on Terrorism (GWOT).[Footnote 1] DOD's reported annual obligations
[Footnote 2] for GWOT have shown a steady increase from about $0.2
billion in fiscal year 2001 to about $162.4 billion in fiscal year
2008. For fiscal year 2009, Congress provided DOD with about $65.9
billion in supplemental appropriations for GWOT as of March 2009 and
the President plans on requesting an additional $75.5 billion in
supplemental appropriations for GWOT for the remainder of the fiscal
year. A total of $31.0 billion has been obligated in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2009 through December 2008. The United States'
commitments to GWOT will likely involve the continued investment of
significant resources, requiring decision makers to consider difficult
trade-offs as the nation faces an increasing long-range fiscal
challenge. The magnitude of future costs will depend on several direct
and indirect cost variables and, in some cases, decisions that have not
yet been made. DOD's future costs will likely be affected by the pace
and duration of operations, the types of facilities needed to support
troops overseas, redeployment plans, and the amount of equipment to be
repaired or replaced.[Footnote 3]
DOD compiles and reports monthly and cumulative incremental obligations
incurred to support GWOT in a monthly report commonly called the
Contingency Operations Status of Funds Report.[Footnote 4] DOD
leadership uses this report, along with other information, to advise
Congress on the costs of the war and to formulate future GWOT budget
requests. DOD reports these obligations by appropriation, contingency
operation,[Footnote 5] and military service or defense agency. DOD has
prepared monthly reports on the obligations incurred for its
involvement in GWOT since fiscal year 2001.[Footnote 6]
Section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006[Footnote 7] requires us to submit quarterly updates to Congress on
the costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom
based on DOD's monthly cost-of-war reports. This report, which responds
to this requirement, contains our analysis of DOD's reported
obligations for military operations in support of GWOT through December
2008. Specifically, we assessed (1) DOD's cumulative appropriations and
reported obligations for military operations in support of GWOT and (2)
DOD's fiscal year 2009 reported obligations from October 2008 through
December 2008, the latest data available for GWOT by military service
and appropriation account.
In fiscal year 2008, we have conducted a series of reviews examining
funding and reported obligations for military operations in support of
GWOT. Our prior work[Footnote 8] has found the data in DOD's monthly
cost-of-war report to be of questionable reliability. Consequently, we
are unable to ensure that DOD's reported obligations for GWOT are
complete, reliable, and accurate, and they therefore should be
considered approximations. Based on this work, we have made a number of
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense intended to improve the
transparency and reliability of DOD's GWOT obligations. For example we
have recommended that DOD (1) revise the cost reporting guidance so
that large amounts of reported obligations are not shown in "other"
miscellaneous categories and (2) take steps to ensure that reported
GWOT obligations are reliable. In response, DOD is taking steps to
improve GWOT cost reporting. For example, DOD has modified its guidance
to more clearly define some of the cost categories and is taking
additional steps to strengthen the oversight and program management of
the cost reporting. Specifically, DOD has taken steps to improve
transparency by requiring components to analyze variances in reported
obligations and to disclose reasons for significant changes, and to
affirm that monthly reported GWOT obligations provide a fair
representation of ongoing activities. Furthermore, in February 2007,
DOD established a Senior Steering Group including representatives from
DOD, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), and the
military services in an effort to standardize and improve the GWOT cost-
reporting process and to increase management attention to the process.
DOD established a GWOT Cost-of-War Project Management Office to monitor
work performed by auditing agencies and to report possible solutions
and improvements to the Senior Steering Group. DOD has started several
initiatives to improve credibility, transparency, and timeliness. One
of the initiatives is a quarterly validation of GWOT obligation
transactions at each of the DOD components with the goal of having a
sampling of all types of costs validated in fiscal year 2008. Until all
DOD efforts are more fully implemented, it is too soon to know the
extent to which these changes will improve the reliability of DOD's
cost reporting.
While establishing sound cost reporting procedures and oversight is
clearly important, the reliability of the cost-of-war reports also
depends on the quality of DOD's accounting data. Factors contributing
to DOD's challenges in reporting reliable cost data include long-
standing deficiencies in DOD's financial management systems. We are
aware that DOD has efforts under way to improve these systems as well.
We have also made recommendations to improve transparency and fiscal
responsibility related to funding the war on terrorism and to permit
the Congress and the administration to establish priorities and make
trade-offs among those priorities in defense funding. Specifically, we
recommended that DOD (1) issue guidance defining what constitutes the
"longer war against terror," identify what costs are related to that
longer war, and build these costs into the base defense budget; (2)
identify incremental costs of the ongoing GWOT operations that can be
moved into the base budget; and (3) in consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget, consider limiting emergency funding requests to
truly unforeseen or sudden events.[Footnote 9] We will continue to
review DOD's efforts to implement these recommendations as part of our
follow-up work on GWOT.
Scope and Methodology:
To conduct our work, we analyzed applicable annual and supplemental
appropriations from fiscal year 2001 through fiscal year 2009 as of
December 2008, the latest GWOT appropriations provided. We also
analyzed DOD's monthly cost of war reports from September 2001 through
December 2008, the latest data available. Specifically, we identified
appropriated amounts primarily intended for GWOT and reported GWOT
obligations for each operation, military service, and appropriation
account.
We will continue to review DOD's funding and reported obligations for
GWOT, including the reliability of the reported obligations. We are
also reviewing DOD's methodology for reporting GWOT costs by
contingency operations, including the types of costs reported for those
operations. We plan to report on this work in March 2009.
We conducted this performance audit from February 2009 to March 2009 in
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that
the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and
conclusions based on our audit objectives.
Summary:
As of December 2008, Congress has appropriated a total of about $808
billion primarily for:
GWOT operations since 2001. Of that amount, about $187 billion has been
provided for fiscal year 2008 and about $65.9 billion has been
appropriated for use in fiscal year 2009. DOD plans on requesting an
additional $75.5 billion in supplemental funds for fiscal year 2009.
DOD has reported obligations of about $685.7 billion for military
operations in support of the war from fiscal year 2001 through fiscal
year 2008 and for fiscal year 2009 (October through December 2008). The
$122.3 billion difference[Footnote 10] between DOD's appropriations and
reported obligations can generally be attributed to multiyear funding
for procurement; military construction; and research, development,
test, and evaluation from previous GWOT-related appropriations[Footnote
11] that have yet to be obligated; and obligations for classified and
other items, which DOD considers to be non-GWOT related, that are not
reported in DOD's cost-of-war reports.[Footnote 12] As part of our
ongoing work, we are reviewing DOD's rationale for reporting its GWOT-
related obligations.
Figure 1 shows the increase in DOD's cumulative reported GWOT
obligations and cumulative GWOT appropriations from fiscal year 2001
through fiscal year 2008 and through the first quarter of fiscal year
2009 (October through December 2008). The appropriations amount
includes the fiscal year 2009 appropriation of $65.9 billion. The
appropriations amount does not include the additional $75.5 billion in
supplemental appropriations that DOD plans on requesting for the
remainder of fiscal year 2009.
Figure 1: DOD's Cumulative Reported GWOT Appropriations and Obligations
for Fiscal Years 2001 through 2008 and for Fiscal Year 2009 through
December 2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: combined line and vertical bar graph]
Fiscal year: 2001;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $17 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $0.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2002;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $31 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $29.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 2003;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $100 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $98 billion.
Fiscal year: 2004;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $166 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $169.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2005;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $269 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $254 billion.
Fiscal year: 2006;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $385 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $352.5 billion.
Fiscal year: 2007;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $554 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $492.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2008;
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $741 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $654.7 billion.
Fiscal year 2009 (October through December);
Cumulative GWOT appropriations: $808 billion;
Cumulative reported GWOT obligations: $685.7 billion.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD and appropriations data.
Notes: Appropriations amounts reflect totals provided in supplemental
and annual appropriations legislation. Reported GWOT obligations
include Operation Noble Eagle, Operation Enduring Freedom, and
Operation Iraqi Freedom, and generally reflect costs reported in DOD's
cost-of-war reports. However, the fiscal year 2002 and 2003 figures
include about $20.1 billion that according to DOD officials was war
related but not reported in DOD's cost-of-war reports. GAO has assessed
the reliability of DOD's obligation data and found significant
problems, such that these data may not accurately reflect the true
dollar value of GWOT obligations.
[End of figure]
Of DOD's total cumulative reported obligations for GWOT through
December 2008 (about $685.7 billion), about $533.5 billion is for
operations in and around Iraq as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and
about $124.1 billion is for operations in Afghanistan, the Horn of
Africa, the Philippines, and elsewhere as part of Operation Enduring
Freedom. The remaining about $28.1 billion is for operations in defense
of the homeland as part of Operation Noble Eagle.
As figure 2 shows, DOD's reported obligations for Operation Iraqi
Freedom have consistently increased each fiscal year since operations
began. The increases in reported obligations for Operation Iraqi
Freedom are in part due to continued costs for military personnel, such
as military pay and allowances for mobilized reservists, and for rising
operation and maintenance expenses, such as higher contract costs for
housing, food, and services and higher fuel costs. In addition, the
need to repair and replace equipment because of the harsh combat and
environmental conditions in theater and the ongoing costs associated
with the surge strategy announced in January 2007, which provided for
the deployment of additional troops, have further increased obligations
for Operation Iraqi Freedom. In contrast, DOD's reported obligations
for Operation Noble Eagle have consistently decreased since fiscal year
2003, largely because of the completion of repairs to the Pentagon and
upgrades in security at military installations that were onetime costs,
as well as a reduction in combat air patrols and in the number of
reserve personnel guarding government installations. Reported
obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom have ranged from $10.3
billion to $20.1 billion each fiscal year since 2003. Recent increases
in reported obligations for Operation Enduring Freedom are in part
caused by higher troop levels in Afghanistan, the costs associated with
training Afghan security forces, and the need to repair and replace
equipment after several years of ongoing operations.
Figure 2: DOD's Reported GWOT Obligations for Fiscal Years 2001 through
2008 by Operation:
[Refer to PDF for image: stacked multiple line graph]
Reported GWOT obligations per fiscal year:
Fiscal year: 2001;
Total obligation: $0.2 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $0.1 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $0.1 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: 0.
Fiscal year: 2002;
Total obligation: $29.1 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $14.2 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $15 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $0.
Fiscal year: 2003;
Total obligation: $68.6 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $6.3 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $15.9 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $46.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 2004;
Total obligation: $71.3 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $3.8 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $10.3 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $57.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2005;
Total obligation: $84.8 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $2.1 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $10.7 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $72 billion.
Fiscal year: 2006;
Total obligation: $98.4 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $0.8 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $14.2 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $83.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 2007;
Total obligation: $139.8 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $0.5 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $20.1 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $119.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 2008;
Total obligation: $162.4 billion;
Operation Noble Eagle: $1.5 billion;
Operation Enduring Freedom: $32 billion;
Operation Iraqi Freedom: $130.3 billion.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD data.
Notes: Operation Iraqi Freedom began in fiscal year 2003; therefore no
obligations were reported in fiscal years 2001 and 2002 for this
operation. Reported GWOT obligations generally reflect costs reported
in DOD's cost-of-war reports. However, the fiscal year 2002 and 2003
figures include about $20.1 billion that according to DOD officials was
war-related but not reported in DOD's cost-of-war reports. GAO has
assessed the reliability of DOD's obligation data and found significant
problems, such that these data may not accurately reflect the true
dollar value of GWOT obligations.
[End of figure]
In fiscal year 2009, through December 2008, DOD reported obligations of
about $31.0 billion, which are about one fifth of the total amount of
obligation it reported for all of fiscal year 2008. Reported
obligations for Operation Iraqi Freedom for the same period continue to
account for the largest portion of total reported GWOT obligations by
operation--about $25.1 billion. In contrast, reported obligations
associated with Operation Enduring Freedom total about $5.9 billion,
and reported obligations associated with Operation Noble Eagle total
about $50.0 million.
The Army accounts for the largest portion of reported obligations for
fiscal year 2009 through December 2008--about $21.5 billion, six times
higher than the almost $3.7 billion in obligations reported for the Air
Force, the military service with the next greatest reported amount.
Among appropriation accounts, operation and maintenance, which includes
items such as support for housing, food, and services; the repair of
equipment; and transportation to move people, supplies, and equipment,
accounts for the largest reported obligations--about $17.6 billion.
Reported obligations for the procurement account represent about 21.8
percent of reported obligations or about $6.8 billion.
Figure 3 shows DOD's reported obligations for fiscal year 2009 through
December 2008 by DOD component and appropriation account.
Figure 3: DOD's Reported GWOT Obligations for Fiscal Year 2009, by DOD
Component and Appropriation Account, as of December 2008:
[Refer to PDF for image: 2 pie-charts]
By DOD component:
Army: $21.5 billion (69.4%);
Air Force: $3.7 billion (11.8%);
Navy: $2.6 billion (8.5%);
Marine Corps: $2.2 billion (7%);
Other DOD components: $1.1 billion (3.4%).
By appropriation account:
Operations and maintenance: $17.6 billion (56.6%);
Procurement: $6.8 billion (21.8%);
Military personnel: $4.5 billion (14.4%);
Other: $2.1 billion (6.8%);
Research, development, test, and evaluation: $0.2 billion (0.5%);
Working construction: $0.0 billion (0.0%);
Military Capital Fund: $0.0 billion (0.0%).
Total: $31 billion.
Source: GAO analysis of DOD data.
Notes: Totals may not add to rounding. The "Other" portion of the
appropriation account pie chart includes programs designed to reimburse
coalition countries for logistical and military support, to train and
equip the Afghan National Army and Armed Forces of Iraq, and to execute
the Commanders Emergency Response Program. GAO has assessed the
reliability of DOD's obligation data and found significant problems,
such that these data may not accurately reflect the true dollar value
of GWOT obligations.
[End of figure]
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation:
In written comments on a draft of this report, DOD noted our report
stated that the Department is continuing to take steps to improve GWOT
cost reporting and mentioned its new GWOT "Status of Funds" report and
the implementation of its revised reporting system. According to DOD,
this process is continuing to mature, but serves as an example of DOD's
efforts to improve transparency, reliability and usefulness of cost of
war reporting. See enclosure I for DOD's response.
We are sending copies of this report to interested congressional
committees; the Secretary of Defense; the Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller); and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. In
addition, this report will be available at no charge on the GAO Web
site at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov].
If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please
contact me at (202) 512-9619 or pickups@gao.gov. Contact points for our
Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on
the last page of this report. Key contributors to this report are
listed in enclosure II.
Signed by:
Sharon L. Pickup:
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management:
Enclosures - 2:
List of Committees:
The Honorable Carl Levin:
Chairman:
The Honorable John McCain:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
United States Senate:
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye:
Chairman:
The Honorable Thad Cochran:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on Defense:
Committee on Appropriations:
United States Senate:
The Honorable Ike Skelton:
Chairman:
The Honorable John McHugh:
Ranking Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
House of Representatives:
The Honorable John P. Murtha:
Chairman:
The Honorable C. W. Bill Young:
Ranking Member:
Subcommittee on Defense:
Committee on Appropriations:
House of Representatives:
[End of section]
Enclosure I: Comments from the Department of Defense:
Under Secretary Of Defense:
Comptroller:
1100 Defense Pentagon:
Washington, DC 20301-1100:
March 25, 2009:
Ms. Sharon L. Pickup:
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20548:
Dear Ms. Pickup:
This is the Department of Defense (DoD) response to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) Draft Report GAO-09-449R, "Global War On
Terrorism: Reported Obligations for the Department of Defense," dated
March 16, 2009, (GAO Code 351313).
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft report. As you
note in your report. the Department is continuing to take steps to
improve cost reporting for these activities. In October 2008, the
Department replaced the Cost of War (CoW) report with the Status of
Funds report, which includes subsidiary reports for the Military
Personnel and Operation and Maintenance accounts. In addition, the
Department has implemented a revised reporting system, the Contingency
Reporting and Contingency Operations Reporting and Analysis Service
(CORAS). This process is continuing to mature but is a primary example
where the Department has taken steps to improve the transparency,
reliability and usefulness of cost of war reporting.
Sincerely,
Signed by:
Robert F. Hale
[End of section]
Enclosure II: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
GAO Contact:
Sharon Pickup, (202) 512-9619 or pickups@gao.gov:
Acknowledgments:
In addition to the contact named above, Ann Borseth, Assistant
Director; Bruce Brown; Ron La Due Lake; Lonnie McAllister; and Eric
Petersen made key contributions to this report.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the President
announced a Global War on Terrorism, requiring the collective
instruments of the entire federal government to counter the threat of
terrorism. Ongoing military and diplomatic operations overseas,
especially in Iraq and Afghanistan, constitute a key part of GWOT.
These operations involve a wide variety of activities, such as
combating insurgents, training the military forces of other nations,
and conducting small-scale reconstruction and humanitarian relief
projects.
[2] According to Department of Defense, Financial Management
Regulation, 7000.14-R, vol. 1, "Definitions" (Dec. 2001), xvii,
obligations are incurred through actions such as orders placed,
contracts awarded, services received, or similar transactions made by
federal agencies during a given period that will require payments
during the same or a future period.
[3] For more information see GAO, Securing, Stabilizing, and Rebuilding
Iraq: Key Issues for Congressional Oversight, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-308SP] (Washington, D.C.: Jan. 9,
2007), and Global War on Terrorism: Observations on Funding, Costs, and
Future Commitments, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-
885T] (Washington, D.C.: July 18, 2006).
[4] This report replaces the Supplemental and Cost of War Execution
Report.
[5] DOD defines contingency operations to include small, medium, and
large-scale campaign-level military operations, including support for
peacekeeping operations, major humanitarian assistance efforts,
noncombatant evacuation operations, and international disaster relief
efforts.
[6] Department of Defense, Financial Management Regulation, 7000.14-R,
vol. 12, ch. 23. This regulation generally establishes financial policy
and procedures related to DOD contingency operations. Volume 6A,
chapter 2, and volume 3, chapter 8, of the DOD Financial Management
Regulation also include provisions to ensure the accuracy of cost
reporting.
[7] Pub. L. No. 109-163, § 1221(c) (2006).
[8] For more information see GAO, Global War on Terrorism: DOD Needs to
Improve the Reliability of Cost Data and Provide Additional Guidance to
Control Costs, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-882]
(Washington, D.C.: Sept. 21, 2005); and Global War on Terrorism: DOD
Needs to Take Action to Encourage Fiscal Discipline and Optimize the
Use of Tools Intended to Improve GWOT Cost Reporting, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-68] (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 6,
2007).
[9] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-68].
[10] We calculated this difference by comparing available data on
appropriations and reported obligations.
[11] Appropriations for military personnel and operation and
maintenance are usually available for 1 year, while appropriations for
research, development, test and evaluation are usually available for 2
years; procurement funds (with the exception of ship building funds,
which are sometimes available longer) are usually available for 3
years; and military construction funds are usually available for 5
years.
[12] We have not reviewed DOD's determination of what appropriations
should be considered non-GWOT.
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Phone:
The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO‘s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO‘s Web site,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm].
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional
information.
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
