Education Information

Changes in Funds and Priorities Have Affected Production and Quality Gao ID: PEMD-88-4 November 4, 1987

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the condition of information on education in the United States to determine the: (1) kinds of information gathering activities the federal government has sponsored and how they have changed; (2) changes in the quality of the information; and (3) factors influencing information production and quality. GAO studied three federally supported educational research and statistical programs, focusing on the: (1) National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); (2) Common Core of Data (CCD) Program for elementary and secondary education; and (3) Fast Response Survey System (FRSS).

GAO found that the number of: (1) research grants and contracts decreased 65 percent from 476 in 1980 to 168 in 1985; (2) evaluation contracts dropped 79 percent from 119 in 1980 to 25 in 1985; and (3) statistical surveys fell 31 percent from 55 in 1980 to 38 in 1983. GAO also found increases in: (1) information dissemination operations and testimony provision, with decreases in research regarding special populations and school problems; and (2) grant and contract awards to department-sponsored institutions. In addition, GAO found that: (1) the quality of information collected varied in terms of relevance, timeliness, technical adequacy, and impact; (2) NAEP quality was generally good, although efforts to optimize one aspect of quality often caused losses in other dimensions; (3) FRSS received high ratings for relevance and medium ratings for technical adequacy and timeliness; (4) CCD had generally poor information quality; (5) congressionally mandated activities consumed an increasing share of available resources; and (6) rapid turnover of staff influenced and frequently changed the direction of activities.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.