Compensatory Education

Aguilar v. Felton Decision's Continuing Impact on Chapter 1 Program Gao ID: HRD-89-131BR September 27, 1989

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO studied the effects of a 1985 Supreme Court decision that prohibited public school teachers from providing Chapter 1 compensatory education remedial services to students on private sectarian school premises, under the Chapter 1 program.

GAO found that: (1) 46 of 52 state education agencies reported that local school districts had spent or planned to spend about $105 million to provide Chapter 1 services, with 6 states accounting for $79.8 million; (2) to provide the remedial services and comply with the decision, school districts spent $31 million on mobile vans, $17 million on neutral sites, and $12 million on portable classrooms; (3) the $34 million school districts spent on computer-aided instruction did not fall within the statutory meaning of noninstructional goods and services covered by Chapter 1; (4) states' shares of the 1989 $19.8 million appropriation for Chapter 1 services were proportional to their shares of Chapter 1 private school students; (5) states based their allocation of funds to districts on program participation or spending; (6) the number of Chapter 1 private school students declined from 185,000 during the 1984-85 school year to 123,000 during the 1985-86 school year, although participation increased to 151,000 students for the 1988-89 school year; (7) factors increasing participation included Department of Education guidance on the permissible use of portable classrooms, mobile vans, and computer-aided instruction and greater parental and private school acceptance of computer-aided instruction; (8) factors hindering participation included parental resistance to busing, mobile vans' limited capacity, and districts' inability to justify costs of providing services to small numbers of students; and (9) districts indicated that they were generally satisfied with the new Chapter 1 service delivery methods.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.