Department of Education

Efforts by the Office for Civil Rights to Resolve Asian-American Complaints Gao ID: HEHS-96-23 December 11, 1995

As with many other federal agencies responsible for enforcing civil rights and equal employment opportunity laws, in recent years the discrimination complaint workload of the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights has increased, but its staffing has remained level. In the early 1990s, compared with the 1980s, the number of compliance reviews fell and the average time to resolve complaint investigations and complete reviews rose. As a result, concerns have been raised about how effectively the Office for Civil Rights carries out its duties. This report examines the Office's complaint investigations and compliance reviews of discrimination cases involving Asian-Americans who applied for or were enrolled in postsecondary schools--mainly colleges and universities.

GAO found that: (1) OCR generally followed its established policies and procedures in the 13 cases reviewed, but 7 of the 11 resolved cases exceeded OCR time frames for resolution and OCR official case files did not adequately reflect headquarters actions; (2) although its staffing levels and other resources remained stable while discrimination complaints increased, OCR averaged less than 180 days in revolving most of its general workload; (3) OCR usually took more time on average to resolve Asian-American cases than other minority cases; (4) the longer resolution periods for Asian-American cases were partially due to the high percentage of cases involving admission issues and greater number of violations per case, which took longer and more resources to resolve; (5) the resolution of Asian-American cases resulted in more corrective actions and changes made by postsecondary schools; (6) OCR has initiated administrative changes to improve its performance and resolution of complaints and compliance reviews which include setting priorities, revising procedures to respond more flexibly to complaints and reduce unnecessary documentation, increasing its use of personal computers and networks to track cases, and redeploying staff to improve productivity; and (7) although OCR has reduced its case backlog, it is too soon tell if these administrative changes will significantly improve OCR handling of complaint investigations and compliance reviews over the long term.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.