Higher Education

Tuition Increases and Colleges' Efforts to Contain Costs Gao ID: HEHS-98-227 September 30, 1998

On a percentage basis, tuition has risen faster at both four-year and two-year public colleges and universities than it has at four-year private institutions--30 percent versus 17 percent in the past five years. However, four-year private schools, which had much higher tuition costs to begin with, had dollar increases that were greater than those of four-year and two-year public schools. The relative size of a school, whether public or private, appeared to have no relationship to the rate of increase. At both four-year public and private schools, the size of tuition increases was statistically linked to several other financial variables, including schools' revenues from grants, contracts, and gifts and changes in schools' costs to provide education. In the case of public schools, changes in government appropriations for higher education were also a factor. Tuition rises at community colleges have closely paralleled increases at four-year public schools in recent years. States, consortiums of schools, and individual colleges and universities have all taken steps to cut schools' operating costs in recent years--from eliminating academic departments to boosting class sizes to privatizing such operations as bookstores and food services. However, these measures may not necessarily lead to lower tuition for students because schools' costs may be only one of several factors considered when decisions on setting tuition are made.

GAO noted that: (1) on a percentage basis, tuition has risen faster at both 4- and 2-year public colleges and universities than at 4-year private schools--30 percent versus 17 percent in the past 5 years; (2) however, 4-year private schools, which had much higher tuitions to begin with, had dollar increases that were greater--$1,763 at 4-year private schools versus $670 at 4-year public schools and $228 at community colleges; (3) the relative size of a school, whether public or private, appeared to have no relationship to the rate of increase; (4) large schools tend to have higher tuitions than small schools, and therefore, although the increase was greater in dollar terms at large schools, the percentage increases were about the same; (5) GAO's analysis showed that the size of tuition increases was statistically related to a variety of other financial variables such as revenues from grants, contracts, and gifts, and, for public schools, state appropriations for higher education and changes in the school's costs of providing education, including noninstructional costs; (6) tuition increases at community colleges have closely paralleled increases at 4-year public schools in recent years; (7) however, there is little evidence that tuition increases at community colleges have been caused by increases at 4-year schools, according to officials and researchers GAO contacted and the literature GAO reviewed; (8) instead, the increases at both 4-year public schools and community colleges are similar either because they are set legislatively or administratively on a statewide basis or because the tuition-setting entities consider the same kinds of factors such as the Consumer Price Index or state funding levels when deciding on tuition increases for both kinds of schools; (9) states, consortiums of schools, and individual colleges and universities have all taken steps to cut schools' operating costs in recent years; (10) in GAO's review of published reports and discussions with education officials, a variety of cost-cutting strategies surfaced, such as eliminating degree programs or academic departments, increasing class sizes, streamlining administrative operations, and privatizing operations like bookstores and food service operations; and (11) while these actions serve to reduce schools' own costs, they may not necessarily result in lower tuition for students because schools' costs may be only one of several factors considered when tuition-setting decisions are made.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.