Nuclear Waste

Problems Associated With DOE's Inactive Waste Sites Gao ID: RCED-88-169 August 3, 1988

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Energy's (DOE) management of inactive waste sites at six defense installations, focusing on: (1) DOE identification of the number of sites at the installations; (2) DOE assessment of sites; and (3) environmental problems at the sites.

GAO found that: (1) the installations lacked accurate site inventories, with DOE headquarters citing a total of 605 inactive waste sites, while DOE installation officials cited 1,447; (2) DOE inconsistently assessed the sites' potential hazards, sometimes using the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazard Ranking System, variations of that system, or not evaluating the sites at all; (3) the installations used different approaches for applying the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) to the sites for remediation; (4) each installation had high levels of groundwater contamination with radioactive and hazardous substances, and two installations also had high levels of soil contamination and some surface water contamination; (5) one installation is on the EPA National Priority List (NPL), and the other five have severe enough problems for likely placement on NPL; (6) the installations require a massive cleanup effort, costing as much as $60 billion; and (7) DOE is currently revising DOE Order 5480.14, outlining its program for identifying, assessing, and cleaning up inactive waste sites, to incorporate additional requirements imposed by the 1986 amendments to CERCLA. GAO believes that DOE needs to develop a comprehensive plan, including milestones and cost estimates, to bring DOE facilities into full compliance with environmental laws.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.