Nuclear Security
DOE Oversight of Livermore's Property Management System Is Inadequate Gao ID: RCED-90-122 April 18, 1990Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO determined the extent of property losses at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and assessed the adequacy of LLNL controls over government-owned property.
GAO found that: (1) LLNL could not account for or locate a substantial number of government-owned items in its custody; (2) an internal inventory determined that the missing property had an acquisition value of over $45 million; (3) LLNL had lost accountability over about 14 percent of certain high-value theft-prone items, worth about $2 million when acquired; and (4) despite the substantial number of missing items, the contract between DOE and the LLNL contractor protected the contractor against liability for such losses. GAO also found that: (1) LLNL property controls did not ensure that government-owned property was adequately safeguarded against theft, unauthorized use, or loss; (2) LLNL had no policies and procedures for controlling items with an acquisition cost below $1,000 and gathered no consistent data on those items, which made it difficult to identify how many items LLNL bought; (3) LLNL did not independently verify government-owned inventories of precious metals that were in the custody of subcontractors, making it difficult for LLNL to verify reported consumption of the metals; (4) DOE did not provide adequate oversight of the LLNL property management system and allowed the contractor to prescribe the terms of the contract; (5) DOE neither required LLNL to conform with DOE property management regulations nor approved the LLNL property management system; and (6) DOE did not develop or provide guidance to LLNL spelling out the criteria for performance of property management functions.
RecommendationsOur recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.
Director: Team: Phone: