Energy Conservation

DOE's Efforts to Promote Energy Conservation and Efficiency Gao ID: RCED-92-103 April 16, 1992

The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for spearheading federal efforts to encourage energy conservation. This report focuses on DOE programs promoting electricity and overall energy efficiency. GAO examines (1) the scope of DOE's energy conservation and efficiency programs, including its Integrated Resource Planning Program; (2) the way in which policy options identified in the National Energy Strategy promote conservation and efficiency, as well as increased energy supplies; and (3) the extent to which DOE evaluates program results and considers evaluation results when planning and budgeting for these programs. GAO also discusses the role of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates most wholesale electricity transactions, in promoting energy conservation and efficiency.

GAO found that: (1) DOE efforts to promote conservation and efficiency encompass funding long-term research and development of efficient technologies, administering energy conservation grant programs and disseminating various technical outreach activities, and promoting efficiency-oriented regulatory and resource planning approaches; (2) in fiscal year (FY) 1992, DOE budgeted about $122 million for research and development of efficient equipment, technologies, and processes, compared to $108 million in FY 1991; (3) NES includes 17 conservation and efficiency policy options and 31 supply-oriented policy options, but does not assign priorities to either conservation and efficiency options or supply-side options; (4) DOE has not systematically evaluated the effectiveness of conservation and efficiency programs in the past, and has historically allocated its funds to conservation and efficiency programs on the basis of existing, or short-term, geopolitical, economic, and other policy considerations; (5) DOE has recently initiated efforts to consider program evaluation results and plans to have a panel of scientific and technical experts evaluate its conservation and efficiency research and then consider the evaluation results when budget decisions are made at specific points in the programs' life cycles; and (6) although FERC has met with state regulators to explore regional planning or other approaches to balance electricity supply and demand at the lowest cost, it has not determined what steps, if any, it should take to encourage electric utilities' use of integrated resource planning.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.