Fossil Fuels

The Department of Energy's Magnetohydrodynamics Development Program Gao ID: RCED-93-174 July 29, 1993

The Department of Energy (DOE), along with industry, has been working for years to develop magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) technology for generating electricity. MHD is a potentially high-efficiency technology that generates electrical power from coal by passing extremely hot coal combustion gases through a channel surrounded by a magnetic field. In recent years, DOE's MHD program has focused on demonstrating the proof-of-concept, or feasibility, of coal-fired MHD electric power plants. This report discusses (1) the financial history of developing MHD technology, (2) progress in meeting the proof-of-concept program's schedule, (3) potential problems and concerns, (4) DOE's management of the program, and (5) DOE's plans for MHD.

GAO found that: (1) by September 1993, the government will have spent $800 million for research and development of coal-fired MHD power generation technology and $223 million in appropriated funds for the POC program; (2) the POC program was designed so that private-sector investors could decide whether to pursue development of MHD technology at new or existing power generation plants; (3) the program might not be able to provide statistically reliable data because the program's testing period has been shortened by more than 1,000 hours; (4) DOE believes that POC program tests have demonstrated the feasibility of its major subsystems, but questions remain concerning its high cost, unresolved problems, uncertainties in system integration, and the type of additional new technology that will be needed to reach the high-efficiency potential expected; (5) DOE has worked closely with the scientific community to disseminate POC program information; (6) DOE is considering a number of private-sector offers for the development of an MHD demonstration project; and (7) the total POC program shutdown costs could vary between $8 million to $16 million depending on the extent of site and environmental restoration costs and related contingencies at DOE testing facilities.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.