Federal Research

Changes in Electricity-Related R&D Funding Gao ID: RCED-96-203 August 16, 1996

Congress earmarked about $1 billion for electricity-related research and development (R&D) in fiscal year 1996. Along with electric utilities, states, and manufacturers, the federal government has traditionally played a major role in this R&D, which includes such technologies as solar energy, fossil-fueled generating systems, and electric cars. The electric utility industry is undergoing deregulation and is becoming more competitive. At the same time, funding cuts are affecting electricity-related R&D. This report discusses (1) the changes that have occurred in the levels of electricity-related R&D and the reasons for those changes and (2) the impact of those changes on the types of R&D being funded. GAO provides information on the impact of reduced funding on six technologies--fuel cells, coal gasification, advanced gas turbines, wind power, photovoltaics, and electricity storage--in which the Energy Department participated. GAO also discusses alternative funding sources suggested by R&D managers and others.

GAO found that: (1) Department of Energy (DOE) funding for electricity-related R&D increased between fiscal years (FY) 1993 and 1995, but began to decrease by FY 1996 due to budget constraints and congressional appropriation committees' recommendations; (2) the electric utility industry began to reduce R&D funding in 1993, and R&D managers expect the decreases to continue as the industry prepares for deregulation and increased competition; (3) some state programs are also experiencing funding reductions, primarily due to decreases in contributions from utilities, oil overcharge revenues, DOE funding, and state appropriations; (4) proprietary data and industry restructuring make it difficult to assess the current level or project future levels of industry spending on electricity-related R&D; (5) many utilities are shifting their R&D focus from collaborative, long-term projects to proprietary, short-term projects to gain a competitive edge; (6) some R&D projects are being delayed, scaled down, or cancelled as a result of the funding reductions; and (7) DOE, industry, and state government officials who expressed concerns about electricity-related R&D funding suggested such alternative funding sources as a state-administered surcharge on all retail sales of electricity and a national wires charge on all electricity entering the transmission grid.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.