High-Risk Series

Department of Energy Contract Management Gao ID: HR-97-13 February 1, 1997

In 1990, GAO began a special effort to identify federal programs at high risk for waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement. GAO issued a series of reports in December 1992 on the fundamental causes of the problems in the high-risk areas; it followed up on the status of these areas in February 1995. This, GAO's third series of high-risk reports, revisits these troubled government programs and designates five additional areas as high-risk (defense infrastructure, information security, the year 2000 problem, supplemental security income, and the 2000 decennial census), bringing to 25 the number of high-risk programs on GAO's list. The high-risk series includes an overview, a quick reference guide, and 12 individual reports. The high-risk series may be ordered as a full set, a two-volume package including the overview and the quick reference guide, or as 12 separate reports describing in detail these vulnerable government programs. GAO summarized the high-risk series in testimony before Congress (GAO/T-HR-97-22).

GAO found that: (1) a major contract reform effort now under way and receiving high priority and visibility at DOE raises expectations for improvement; (2) responding to continued criticism of DOE's contract management, in 1993 the Secretary of Energy established a Contract Reform Team; (3) the Reform Team evaluated the Department's contracting practices and, in its February 1994 report, recommended nearly 50 actions to fundamentally change DOE's contracting practices; (4) in response, DOE has made progress in developing an array of policies and procedures; (5) in addition, DOE is including incentives to improve performance and control costs in its contracts; (6) DOE also has initiated a new approach for some environmental cleanup work in an attempt to shift much of the risk and responsibility onto the contractor; (7) although DOE has made headway, most of the completed actions were delayed, which will push back the implementation of the final reforms accordingly; (8) the changes proposed in DOE's current reforms, which are unprecedented in scope within DOE, provide a comprehensive plan to address the problems resulting from its past contracting practices; (9) this effort will require time as the current contracts are either competitively awarded or noncompetitively renewed with the reform provisions incorporated into the contracts; (10) continued high-level monitoring and oversight by DOE will be needed to identify problems, standardize the best practices, and make needed corrections as DOE makes its way through these changes; and (11) DOE should competitively award its management and operating contracts to the greatest extent possible and link the contractors' goals to DOE's strategic goals.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.