Reasonable Charge Reductions Under Part B of Medicare

Gao ID: HRD-81-12 October 22, 1980

GAO examined whether Medicare beneficiaries are being properly reimbursed for doctors' bills under the Medicare program. Part B of the Medicare Program, which primarily covers the cost of physician services, is paying an increasingly smaller portion of the elderly's total cost for physician services. On the average, the charges submitted by doctors are reduced by about 20 percent by the program, because they do not meet Medicare's reasonable charge criteria. The percentage of claims where the program reimburses the beneficiary (unassigned claims) rather than the doctor (assigned claims) has increased from about 35 percent to about 50 percent. Where the program pays the beneficiary, he or she is liable for the difference between the submitted charges and Medicare's reasonable charges in addition to the normal 20 percent coinsurance amounts. On assigned claims, the physician agrees to accept Medicare's allowed charge as full payment, and the beneficiary is liable only for the coinsurance on the allowed charges.

GAO identified four areas where it believes beneficiaries are being subjected to inequitable reasonable charge reductions. These areas are: physician markups on laboratory procedures performed by independent laboratories, the use of fee and one-half reimbursement policies for pricing surgical procedures, the use of relative value schedules for computing a physician's customary charge for a procedure he or she rarely performs, and inadequate scrutiny of claims as they are processed by carriers. Pending legislation would require the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to take additional measures to eliminate Medicare reimbursement for physician markups on laboratory procedures. HCFA requires that, for procedures done on the same day, carriers are to base reimbursement on the major procedure only, or the major procedure plus partial amounts for the other procedures. GAO found a high incidence of underpayments on claims with relatively large reasonable charge reductions. Beneficiaries in the same area should be treated equally whether they are seeing an established physician or a new physician. HCFA must establish more specific claims processing standards to provide assurance that beneficiaries are not underpaid. If underpayments are identified, they must be relatively significant. Claims requiring development by the carrier inherently require more time to process and cost more. Carriers have a built-in disincentive to careful claims development. Beneficiaries cannot be expected to know the details of claims processing requirements.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.