Software Used in Medical Devices Needs Better Controls To Avoid Compromising Patient Safety

Gao ID: AFMD-81-95 August 5, 1981

Computer technology is becoming more and more an internal part of many medical devices and is providing many benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of patients' illnesses. GAO reviewed the use of computerized medical devices to determine if they are dependable enough to avoid compromising patient safety and, if not, how the controls being developed by the Bureau of Medical Devices will address this area of computer technology.

Advances in computer technology have brought about far more reliable hardware. However, software has been and remains a problem area, regardless of whether it is used in medical or business applications. GAO believes the use of software in medical devices is emerging as a troublesome area and requires the attention of the Bureau of Medical Devices. The use of performance standards, as authorized by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, is a possible mechanism to help control the performance of software in computerized medical devices. Unfortunately, the time-consuming process for developing standards together with the large number of standards to be developed makes it very unlikely that any standards will be available soon. This, coupled with the relatively fast pace at which computer technology changes, makes it unlikely that the standards, when developed, will be timely enough to validate software in medical devices. GAO believes the the Bureau's recent establishment of the task group is a wise and timely initiative.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.